AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Aloha Smith

HUM10 · ENG23 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.4

The decision

if you can handle reading and are comfortable with her classroom tone.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEasy graderClear on testsPassionate teacherFlexible makeupHeavy reading
  • , and .
  • She and allows makeups.
  • One review strongly objects to religious bias despite high quality scores.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students say tests are short, she , and grades leniently.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Difficulty ratings are very low; .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Lecture matters and she holds class to the end, but comments .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Four of five reviews glow about helpfulness and ease; one outliers on religious tone.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

and test makeups when you miss.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Light

72/100

Workload is light overall though two books and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students say she loves the , and supports every student.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; one ENG23 review is a sharp character critique.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Short fact-based tests plus reading and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and easy grading, with one strong bias complaint.

Main concern

One student felt she was bigoted about religious groups and discouraged questions.

What students said

“She is one of the nicest teachers I've ever had.”
HUM10
“Great teacher, easy to understand, very flexible, and easy on the grading.”
HUM10
“Unless you want a religious zealot for a teacher STAY AWAY!!”
ENG23

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and grades on fact volume.

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and fact-based.

Tells what is on testsShort 10-question testsMakeup tests allowedExtra credit points
“She tells you exactly what will be on the tests. If you miss a next class.”
HUM10
“Test are 10 questions long and she does tell you what to study.”
HUM10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher, easy to understand, very flexible, and easy on the grading.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and one tone concern. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“ .”

🅰️

88/100

“easy on the grading.”

📝 Test Clarity

84/100

“She tells you exactly what will be on the tests.”

⚠️ Classroom Tone Risk

40/100

“makes fun of less popular Christian groups, talks in circles and does not want the class to question her thinking.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's really into what she is teaching.
  • .
  • Techer loves what she does.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy on the grading.
  • She gives a lot of opportunity for .
  • There is a lot of reading involved

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • one of the nicest teachers I've ever had.
  • very flexible
  • religious zealot for a teacher STAY AWAY!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five mostly consistent reviews with strong positives, but small sample and one conflicting character critique.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HUM104 reviews
ENG231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values