AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Deon Kidd

PHT4PHT2 · APPLIEDSCI · PHT2AND5 · CLINICALMED · PHT2COURSE · PHT2ANDPHT4 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want an energetic clinical instructor and will put in the work for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging PBLExtremely helpfulChallenging examsGold standard supportEntertaining lectures
  • Five of six reviews rate him a 5 and , and highly supportive.
  • PBL case studies make complex clinical topics engaging and relevant.
  • Exams are challenging and one outlier review signals very high expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students report and grades like B or C, so an A requires real study despite great teaching.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is clinically complex with , though .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Nearly every student calls him awesome, the gold standard, and pours praise on his support and energy.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reported grades include B and C with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Engaging PBL and clinical prep create a real study load, not a light pass.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students , and deeply committed to student success.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

PBL case studies and and grades.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person health and pharmacy tech courses feel energetic and and .

Main concern

and very high content expectations for some students.

What students said

“Awesome professor! Extremely helpful. He makes going to class entertaining--not a chore.”
APPLIEDSCI
“Great instructor but . Dr. Kidd PBL's are very engaging and help to solidify complex topics.”
PHT2AND5
“Dr. Kidd's PBL case studies really help me better understand the clinical revelance of medicine topics.”
PHT2COURSE

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly called challenging, while PBL cases .

Challenging examsPBL case studies

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews highlight challenging exams paired with engaging PBL prep, without proving proctoring software or open-book policy.

Challenging examsPBL cases
“Great instructor but .”
PHT2AND5
“Know everything about everything”
PHT4PHT2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awesome professor! Extremely helpful. He makes going to class entertaining--not a chore.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting support, PBL engagement, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

⭐ Teaching Excellence

90/100

“Awesome professor! Extremely helpful. He makes going to class entertaining--not a chore.”

🧠 Engaging PBL

88/100

“Dr. Kidd's PBL case studies really help me better understand the clinical revelance of medicine topics.”

📝

42/100

“Great instructor but .”

Theme 1

👨‍⚕️ About Teaching Style

  • Never a boring moment!!!
  • Keep your head up Dr. Kidd AKA the gold standard.
  • You ROCK!!!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Great instructor but .
  • Know everything about everything
  • I appreciate all your support and energy you pour into the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • always available to help students.
  • Extremely helpful.
  • I support and thank you for your continued support and commitment to the students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six same-period 2014 reviews are highly consistent and fairly detailed, but the sample is still small and old.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

APPLIEDSCI1 review
CLINICALMED1 review
PHT2AND51 review
PHT2ANDPHT41 review
PHT2COURSE1 review
Show 1 more courses
PHT4PHT21 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values