AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Afzel Muhammed

MATH51 · MATH52 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

; reviews unanimously describe a hostile, unhelpful teaching experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHumiliates StudentsUnapproachableWon't Answer QuestionsWorst TeacherStrict HW Formatting
  • Every review rates quality at 1 and .
  • Students say he humiliates question-askers and is not helpful.
  • Very old sample (2005-2008) with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

One reported A exists, but and instead focus on hostility and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty ratings are mostly high and students do not describe the math content as easy or well supported.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

No review clearly states .

sample.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every student who left a written comment .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students stress rigid homework formatting and an unhelpful, punitive classroom .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

as format-strict, but overall workload volume is not clearly described as light or heavy.

Format shift

Workload detail is limited and all from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Reviews uniformly call him the , and unwilling to answer questions without humiliation.

Format shift

All teaching comments are from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize homework formatting more than exams, with .

Format shift

Assessment detail is sparse and all from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All five in-person reviews call him the , and humiliating when students ask questions.

Main concern

Hostile classroom tone and refusal to help when students ask questions.

What students said

“ . Dont ever ask him questions because he will not answer them and will humiliate you infront of everyone.”
MATH52
“Absolutely the . Hates if you ask him Q's. and over all just a rotten man.”
MATH52
“ UNLESS YOU WANT TO BE AMAZED AT HOW CRAZY HE IS”
MATH51

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Dont ever ask him questions because he will not answer them and will humiliate you infront of everyone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2008, highlighting hostility and avoidance themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

💀 Teaching Quality

10/100

“Absolutely the . Hates if you ask him Q's. and over all just a rotten man.”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“ .”

⚠️ Classroom Climate

15/100

“Don't you dare piss him off or he will adjust his glasses and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not teach well.
  • he never changes his clothes.seriously he doesnt. he is very weird.
  • This man is off the hook!Does not teach well.

Theme 2

💬 About Questions and Help

  • Dont ever ask him questions because he will not answer them and will humiliate you infront of everyone.
  • Hates if you ask him Q's.
  • he gets mad when students ask him ?s.

Theme 3

📉 About Overall Advice

  • .
  • UNLESS YOU WANT TO BE AMAZED AT HOW CRAZY HE IS
  • very anal about formatting your HW.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent all-negative reviews raise confidence in tone, but the sample is old (2005-2008) and and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH524 reviews
MATH511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values