AI Rate Professor

English

Kathryn Nanneman

ENG60B · ENG50 · ENG60A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want light English work and flexible topics, but expect mixed teaching energy.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy EssaysEarly ReleaseLight HomeworkMixed ReviewsStrict For Some
  • Several students call her easy with short essays and .
  • A , and hard to learn from.
  • Reviews are old and split, so the experience seems highly section-dependent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report short essays, easy homework, and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is described as easy developmental English with simple one-paragraph essays and light grammar work.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

comments.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About half the detailed reviews are positive on ease and help, while others strongly advise against her teaching style.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Multiple students describe easy grading and one explicitly got an A with light work.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

Comments highlight only a , and early release.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Positive notes call her helpful and nice, but others say she is boring, strict, and cannot teach.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Grades mix short essays with a exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, and easy homework, while a few call her boring and strict.

Main concern

Some sections feel strict and uninspiring despite the light workload.

What students said

“Mrs Nanneman is a good professor. No quizzes. and a final. , and you can pick your own topics. Its . Easy teacher.”
ENG60A
“This teacher sucks. Boring, strict,makes you not want to go to class. Cant teach”
ENG60B
“Mrs nannemnan is a great teacher, who is very helpful. She lets you pick your own topics. The . I loved her class got an A”
ENG50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear limited and standard, with light essay load and little detail on proctoring.

Midterm and FinalGrammar TestShort Essays

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final plus a grammar test alongside short essays.

Midterm and FinalGrammar TestShort Essays
“No quizzes. and a final. , and you can pick your own topics.”
ENG60A
“ .”
ENG60B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mrs Nanneman is a good professor. No quizzes. and a final. , and you can pick your own topics. Its . Easy teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2012, balancing easy-workload praise against harsh teaching criticism. Credibility rating: Low.

📝

78/100

“ , and you can pick your own topics. Its . Easy teacher.”

👎 Teaching Polarization

35/100

“This teacher sucks. Boring, strict,makes you not want to go to class. Cant teach”

🎯 Easy A Potential

78/100

“I loved her class got an A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . .
  • This teacher sucks. Boring, strict,makes you not want to go to class.
  • Mrs nannemnan is a great teacher, who is very helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy teacher.
  • The . I loved her class got an A
  • Easier on night classes. Early release.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Six mostly sparse reviews from 2008-2012 with mixed tone and little grade detail lower confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG502 reviews
ENG60A2 reviews
ENG60B2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values