AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

A Lash

MATH · MAT64 · MATH64 · MATH425 · MATH35 · ALGEB1235 · ALGEBRA · MAT36 · MAT52 · ENG36 · MAT10 · MATH11 · MATADHY · MATH10 · MATH52 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerNitpicky graderHard testsRushes lecturesPolarizingNo partial credit
  • Many students ace homework yet fail exams due to extreme nitpicking on steps and notation.
  • and and unapproachable.
  • Best only for strong math students .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even perfect homework can fail on tests because of .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Material and pacing are repeatedly called hard, rushed, and easy to get lost in.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

, but success stories stress being in class and paying attention.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

More students warn against him for picky tests and poor teaching than recommend him for strong math students.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Widely described as nitpicky with no partial credit and marks off for missing steps or notation.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Online or high overall burden.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Knows math well but many say he cannot teach: , and frustrated by questions.

Format shift

All evidence is from in-person reviews; a .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, but and are graded with extreme strictness.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

intelligent but , and rushed in lecture; a minority thrives while .

Main concern

credit, so HW success often does not transfer to exams.

What students said

“I get 100% on hw and fail the tests!”
MATH64
“ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”
MATH11
“ but if you're in class and pay attention you will do great.”
MATH52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are very hard and graded with zero tolerance for small steps, notation, or decimal errors.

Nitpicky gradingNo partial creditHard testsStep perfection required

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as extremely picky with little or no partial credit for nearly correct work.

No partial creditMarks off missing stepsHard testsSome take-home tests (older review)
“ and the whole problem is wrong.”
MATH35
“I get 100% on hw and fail the tests!”
MATH64
“ ”
MATH10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I get 100% on hw and fail the tests! and TRUST ME i'm not the only one.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting picky exams, teaching polarization, and . Credibility rating: High.

❌

18/100

“ and the whole problem is wrong.”

⚠️ HW-Test Disconnect

28/100

“I get 100% on hw and fail the tests!”

📉 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

🧠 Minority Positive View

55/100

“I loved this class! Mr. Lash is a great teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's very smart, but CANNOT teach!
  • He rushes thru ten problems and skips solutions.
  • He does a fine job going over the material and makes sure that you understand it before he goes on.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I get 100% on hw and fail the tests!
  • and the whole problem is wrong.
  • Very hard to pass!!!!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Personality

  • HE'S VERY COCKY AND ARROGANT
  • it's either his way or hit the high way very bad teacher the worst

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews spanning 2004-2010 with detailed, and mixed teaching praise.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 56
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH103 reviews
MATH112 reviews
MATH352 reviews
MATH4252 reviews
MATH522 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ALGEB12351 review
ALGEBRA1 review
ENG361 review
MAT101 review
MAT361 review
MAT521 review
MAT641 review
MATADHY1 review
MATH1 review
MATH641 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values