AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lambertus Timmermans

MAT64 · MATH64 · MATH35 · MAT52 · MAT53 · MATH52 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you already have algebra basics and can learn from board work and his .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCares about successNo homeworkTests determine gradeCan miss classPolarizing math style
  • Strong praise for caring teaching and clarity when students click with him
  • ; grades often
  • Critics report rudeness, no-shows, and hard-to-follow lectures

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and , but weak algebra prep or missed classes can force a withdraw or F.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Several call it easy if you pay attention, but others say you must know algebra and find his own problems .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

; others complain he himself often does not show.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Enthusiastic recommendations for struggling math students are common, tempered by harsh negative reviews on tone and reliability.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

No and , harsh if you fall behind.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

; workload is light outside class and tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Half the reviews call him caring and clear; others describe belittling, tangents, and no-shows.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Multiple reviews state tests alone determine the grade with little or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Many call him the and reviews before tests, while others cite missed classes, rudeness, and .

Main concern

Inconsistent attendance and grade .

What students said

“THIS GUY IS THE .”
MATH64
“Tests only thing that determines your grade. .”
MAT52
“He is rude and quick to belittle your question”
MATH52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some report pre-test reviews and notes as the main study tools.

Board TestsNo Written Test PacketsReview Before Test

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; reviews and notes help, but tests carry almost all the grade weight.

Board TestsReview Day Before Test
“Never had a the board.”
MATH64
“reviews the day before the test and will stay late to help.”
MAT53

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THIS GUY IS THE .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, balancing high praise for care and clarity with concerns about no-shows and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Never had a Math teacher like him before. He is the best.”

📚

85/100

“Tests only thing that determines your grade. .”

⚠️ Polarizing Presence

40/100

“He is rude and quick to belittle your question”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • HE TRULY CARES ABOUT US AND OUR SUCCESS!
  • and puts all the class work on his web site
  • Dont be afraid to ask questions, he is really good with clarity

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class was pretty easy. Pay attention to specific examples
  • Must understand algebra before taking class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Reliability

  • he didnt show up to class so most of the time it was a waist of a drive
  • He uses Twitter sometimes to tell u when he wont b n class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight in-person reviews from 2007-2010 mix strong praise and strong criticism with decent detail but older data and no grades listed.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH522 reviews
MATH642 reviews
MAT521 review
MAT531 review
MAT641 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values