AI Rate Professor

Human Services

A. Livingston

HMS16 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid if you need a prepared instructor; this class looks like busywork without strong teaching support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy For CreditsReads SlidesWeak Content MasteryLots Of WorkPoor Clarity
  • One-unit class piled on a , and a test
  • Student says she reads web printouts for hours and cannot answer questions
  • Low quality rating with and spelling

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Content may be simple, but a research paper, presentation, quizzes, and a .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

78/100

Difficulty is rated very low, yet the complaint is about workload and delivery rather than hard concepts.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The student paints the teacher as unprepared and the course as .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, but multiple graded pieces raise the cost of mistakes.

Format shift

In-person only; online has no reviews.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

A one-unit course still requires a research paper, presentation, quizzes, and a test.

Format shift

In-person only; online has no reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Student says she reads offline web pages, cannot answer questions, and has poor spelling.

Format shift

In-person only; online has no reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Both major assignments and as course requirements.

Format shift

In-person only; online has no reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person review describes overloaded work for one unit and lectures that .

Main concern

Weak content mastery and heavy assessments for a one-unit class.

What students said

“A lot of work for a one unit class. and test.”
HMS16
“This teacher really doesnt know what she is talking about, she will print stuff off the net and then just read it to you for 3 hours of class.”
HMS16

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments include quizzes and a and presentation; proctoring details are not proven.

QuizzesTestResearch PaperPresentation

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a test along with a research paper and presentation.

QuizzesTestResearch PaperPresentation
“ and test.”
HMS16

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher really doesnt know what she is talking about, she will print stuff off the net and then just read it to you for 3 hours of class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 detailed negative review on workload and lecture quality. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Workload Shock

22/100

“A lot of work for a one unit class. and test.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“This teacher really doesnt know what she is talking about, she will print stuff off the net and then just read it to you for 3 hours of class.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“Half the time i would ask a question and she had no clue how to answer.”

Theme 1

📈 About Workload

  • A lot of work for a one unit class.
  • and test.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • she will print stuff off the net and then just read it to you for 3 hours of class.
  • Half the time i would ask a question and she had no clue how to answer.
  • Also bad penmanship and spelling!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

A single 2009 review is detailed but too old and isolated to rank highly.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HMS161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values