AI Rate Professor

Anatomy

Slavica Ostojic-Covert

PHT21 · ANT101N · ANATOMY10 · AMY10 · AMYAMY · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want rigorous A&P and can handle a dense lecture style and accent; avoid if you need easy listening or a short term.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDeep Content KnowledgeThick AccentMixed ReviewsHigher-Level TeachingAnatomy Intensive
  • She has deep anatomy and physiology knowledge and teaches processes rather than pure memorization.
  • Accent and clarity are polarizing, with one very harsh review and several positive ones.
  • Students warn against short semesters because the subject is taught at a higher level.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

No free-A claims appear; the subject is hard and short terms are discouraged.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students call the material difficult and higher-level than simple A&P classes.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

comments.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Some students praise her expertise while others call her the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Comments focus on .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload details are limited, but dense physiology content implies solid effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Strong content knowledge is offset by accent complaints and one very negative review.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews as the main grade driver.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and criticism of accent and teaching clarity.

Main concern

Thick accent and higher-level pace can frustrate students who want simpler A&P.

What students said

“Her knowledge of the human physiology is ridiculously thorough.”
PHT21
“ ”
AMYAMY
“She has a very thick accent that makes it very hard to understand a word she says.”
ANATOMY10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her knowledge of the human physiology is ridiculously thorough. She teaches process of the body so that signs/symptoms don't need memorized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting expertise versus accent and pace concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧠 Content Expertise

75/100

“Her knowledge of the human physiology is ridiculously thorough.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“she is a wonderful teacher she relly knows her stuff”

🔊 Clarity Concerns

30/100

“She has a very thick accent that makes it very hard to understand a word she says.”

⏱️ Pace Warning

40/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches process of the body so that signs/symptoms don't need memorized.
  • She also mankes notes for herself and for her students.
  • You will learn and enjoy the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Simple A&P classes don't like her because she teaches at a higher level.

Theme 3

🔊 About Clarity & Accent

  • The way she speaks is really adorable.
  • Her greek/russian accent does not make UNunderstandable
  • She has a very thick accent that makes it very hard to understand a word she says.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five mixed reviews from 2005-2009 give a usable but dated and inconsistent picture.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AMY101 review
AMYAMY1 review
ANATOMY101 review
ANT101N1 review
PHT211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values