AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Samuel Hughes

PHI10 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Prefer in person if possible; treat the online section as high-risk until more reviews appear.

Best fit · DependsPolarizing by formatTough grader onlineAmazing lectures in personSo many papersEXTRA CREDIT
  • In-person experience is chill and easy to follow with
  • , and heavily loaded with papers
  • Support and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

In person an A+ with mirrored quizzes looks easy, but and .

In person reports easy A path; and heavy papers.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

In-person content is common-sense and clear, while online is described as hard to manage with many papers.

In person easier; online much harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Both formats report attendance as mandatory.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; online review is strongly negative with .

Recommendation is positive in person and negative online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and flexible help in person clash with and severe scoring reports.

Format shift

Lenient in person; harsh online.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

In person workload seems light with mirrored quizzes; .

Format shift

Light in person; heavy papers online.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

online.

Format shift

Strong in person; poor online.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and tests plus papers and across formats.

Format shift

In person quiz-test focused; online paper and test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

fair, and the professor flexible with timely communication.

Main concern

and success still requires consistent notes.

What students said

“easy to follow. common sense is required to be able to complete the class.”
PHI-10
“quizzes and and offer EC in class.”
PHI-10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online review describes rigid harsh teaching, unclear expectations, late-released work, and .

Main concern

, and dismissive clarification responses.

What students said

“The professor's rigid and unnecessarily harsh teaching style makes the course difficult to manage.”
PHI-10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

in while online is paper- and .

Quizzes mirror homeworkIn-class extra creditTest heavyMany papers

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests are not difficult and mirror homework with in-class .

Quizzes mirror homeworkIn-class extra creditTests not difficult
“quizzes and and offer EC in class.”
PHI-10

Online

Online review does not detail proctoring but , and test-heavy structure.

Test heavySo many papersSevere grading
“assignments are released close to deadlines, submissions close quickly, and .”
PHI-10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The professor's rigid and unnecessarily harsh teaching style makes the course difficult to manage.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews split by format, highlighting opposite online and in-person experiences. Credibility rating: Low.

🖥️ Online Harshness

15/100

“Expectations are often unclear, assignments are released close to deadlines, submissions close quickly, and .”

🏫

85/100

“chill guy, pay attention to lectures and and ”

⚖️ Format Split

50/100

“Is flexible if you communicate on time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • easy to follow
  • chill guy
  • Requests for clarification are typically redirected to the syllabus with minimal support

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • quizzes and
  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two opposing format-split reviews .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHI-102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1