AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ana Elizarraras

MATH120 · MATH106 · MATH232 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
76.19%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can; put in steady work and she is one of the .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring MentorStrong FeedbackTest HeavyGroup Work FocusedIn-Person Standout
  • Students widely praise ACE as , and .
  • Homework and , and falling behind is hard to recover from.
  • Online quality is more mixed due to older videos and self-teaching, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students earn A or B grades, but homework, participation, and .

; online success still depends on keeping up with heavy modules.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, yet stats and algebra still feel hard and time-consuming for many.

Online students more often call it tedious or self-taught; in-person students stress pace more than pure conceptual wall.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

as required, and group or Zoom engagement is part of the grade.

; online often requires Zoom or participation checks even when listed optional.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

About three in because she cares, answers questions, and prepares students for tests.

In-person recommendation is stronger; online has a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Homework and practice often help, but and cheating policies are strict.

Format shift

Both formats report fair help for effort; online mentions cheating detection more clearly.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and projects are manageable if current, but easy to get buried if you lag.

Format shift

Online reviews more often say lots of homework; in-person still expects weekly work and group tasks.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and confidence-building, with the main weakness in some online delivery.

Format shift

In-person teaching is widely excellent; online quality is more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests and quizzes carry heavy weight, though homework and participation also count.

Format shift

; online also stresses OLI checkpoints.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and one of the best math teachers for building confidence.

Main concern

Fast lectures and and participation.

What students said

“ ”
MATH120
“ACE, gave me hope to learn math again.”
MATH232
“ .”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but others call it teach-yourself with old videos, heavy OLI work, and uneven engagement.

Main concern

Self-paced modules and aging lecture videos can feel unsupported if you need live teaching.

What students said

“ . I've heard that in person she is a great and fun teacher, but online is a different story.”
MATH232
“ and straightforward class but it was just a lot of work. if you get behind you're cooked.”
MATH232
“Don't because you will be caught.”
MATH106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are serious and monitored for outside tools, but .

Test HeavyCheat DetectionHomework PrepStatCrunch/OLI

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and she fails students for outside sources during tests, while .

Test HeavyNo Outside CalculatorsHomework Aligns to Tests
“She will fail you for using any OUTSIDE sources while taking a makes very clear lol”
MATH120
“The (but not easy) and over prepares you for the tests.”
MATH120

Online

Online exams are treated seriously, with students warned not to use outside calculators or cheat.

Test HeavyCheat DetectionOLI Modules
“Don't because you will be caught.”
MATH106
“But, when it comes to the and make sense.”
MATH232

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ACE, gave me hope to learn math again. I actually had a lot of hatred for math for a good portion of my life but she provided bite size, digestible lessons.”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, separating online and and , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ ”

❤️ Support & Care

85/100

“She is a professor who is really nice and , and class advice. Loved her!”

📈 Workload Reality

42/100

“ and straightforward class but it was just a lot of work. if you get behind you're cooked.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“Overall 10/10 Professor!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Class is entertaining and homework if
  • bite size, digestible lessons
  • Her lectures are useless sorry ACE

Theme 2

📊

  • , but if you give it 100% you'll do well
  • Don't because you will be caught
  • if you get behind you're cooked

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • in person she is a great and fun teacher
  • Mostly a teach-yourself online class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one fairly detailed reviews with a , though the sample is moderate.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH23215 reviews
MATH1205 reviews
MATH1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 1