AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jennifer Aguayo

MATH106 · MATH232 · MATH115 · STAT232 · MATH108 · MATH120 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
56.25%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you can invest many hours weekly, attend strictly, and use office hours or tutoring.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHomework heavyTough math paceHelpful if you grindAttendance strictALEKS overload
  • High difficulty with and
  • and patient for students who seek help, but others feel unsupported
  • Summer and online sections amplify workload and frustration

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

As happen, but , and study; many report B, C, D, or .

Online and summer sections look harder for grades; or B with grind.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students repeatedly call calculus, trig, and stats tough with unrealistically fast pacing and huge weekly loads.

Online reviews lean BrainBurner intensity; in person is still hard but more students say lectures help.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and absences can dock the grade even for emergencies.

In person is strictest; while others no.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About half the and praise clarity, while others call the load horrible and unhelpful.

In-person stats and algebra reviews are warmer; online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and test-heavy structure leave little cushion for mistakes.

Format shift

Online late-pass limits and summer speed feel harshest; in .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

, and papers dominate student complaints.

Format shift

Both formats are heavy; online ALEKS weeks and summer sessions are the worst.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

, and clear for engaged students, but others feel rushed, condescending, or unavailable.

Format shift

In-person praise is stronger; online includes several harsh failure-to-help comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

and , and finals rather than one pure focus.

Format shift

Online stresses ALEKS and quizzes; in person adds lectures, labs, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person many students respect her organization and patience, and .

Main concern

Absences dock grades and office hours may not fit working students.

What students said

“If . I actually understood what was going on in her class.”
MATH232
“she will doc your grade if you're absent even for emergencies.”
MATH115
“Ive spend 8-10 hours a and working on the labs.”
STAT232

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

massive ALEKS loads, few late passes, fast summer pacing, and uneven help.

Main concern

Workload and support complaints and low-grade reports.

What students said

“I took her online course, she assigns so much that it was very overwhelming.”
MATH106
“she assign so and only gives you two late pass”
MATH120
“ ; its way too fast paced.”
STAT232

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Courses are test-heavy with quizzes and formal exams; support materials help but pacing and volume stay high.

Test heavyPop quizzesPractice tests with keysExam tech issues

Assessment risk

Strict

36/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person exams match lecture material, with practice tests and .

Practice tests with keysMultiple exams and quizzesMaterial matches exams
“All of the material taught is exactly how it is on the exams. No surprises.”
MATH232
“Uploads practice tests w/keys for Exams(4 +Final) & Quizzes(5) EC”
MATH120

Online

Online exams and and content mismatches reported.

Test heavyConfusing quizzesComputer difficulty friction
“ while taking the exam.”
MATH108
“several of her "common core" quizzes had nothing to do with the , and one even presented incorrect information.”
MATH106

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This isn't an easy class so you really have to put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, contrasting heavy load complaints with . Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

18/100

“I took her online course, she assigns so much that it was very overwhelming.”

🌟 When Teaching Clicks

70/100

“If . I actually understood what was going on in her class.”

⏱️

18/100

“she will doc your grade if you're absent even for emergencies.”

👍

52/100

“Overall if you do the work you will definitely pass.”

Theme 1

📘 About Workload

  • ALEKS alone took hours to complete.
  • Ive spend 8-10 hours a and working on the labs.
  • the workload is insane some weeks.

Theme 2

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Help

  • She has office hours most of the weekdays.
  • she was really showed her patience with me and wanted me to do well.
  • and truly cares for her students.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • SHE WAS HORRIBLE NEVER TAKING HER AGAIN.
  • she didn't wanted to help you at all
  • Slightly condescending in telling students to manage their time better

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen mixed, detailed reviews across online and in-person math courses form a .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH2324 reviews
MATH1063 reviews
MATH1153 reviews
MATH1203 reviews
STAT2322 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MATH1081 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1