AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Greg Miraglia

ADMJ120 · ADMJ123 · CRIMJUS · ADMJ · INTROTOADMIN · LGBT120 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and real-world speakers, but vet current course content carefully after the recent red-flag review.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerEngaging lecturesPassionateParticipation mattersGuest speakersMixed reviews
  • Many students praise engaging LGBT and CJ lectures, guest speakers, and a supportive classroom.
  • Older online ADMJ , and uneven homework grading.
  • A recent review raises serious concern about inappropriate .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Doing the work and participating usually yields solid grades, but and variable difficulty appear in several reviews.

The single online review calls it pretty easy; to tough grader.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content can be interesting and discussion-based but , and non-easy CJ or LGBT material.

Online hybrid felt lighter; several in-person and older course comments describe challenge and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation as central to success.

; in-person LGBT reviews repeatedly list attendance as required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and engaging teaching, tempered by older complaints and one severe recent criticism.

Online hybrid review is positive; in-person recommendations dominate but include a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Some students pass by doing work while others report tough or .

Format shift

Online hybrid notes clear criteria; older ADMJ .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload ranges from about two hours weekly plus lectures to heavy weekly reading and multiple textbooks.

Format shift

Single online review describes light hybrid work; older ADMJ-style comments report heavy reading.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and discussion-rich, though a minority find him disengaged or inappropriate.

Format shift

Online hybrid praises knowledge and accommodation; in-person praise is strong but not unanimous.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Courses blend discussion posts, homework, participation, quizzes or exams, guest speakers, and projects.

Format shift

, and chapter quizzes; in-person adds participation and field elements.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person LGBT and and engaging, with older online-style ADMJ complaints mixed in on flagged in-person records.

Main concern

Recent content-boundary complaint and older heavy-reading or .

What students said

“He creates an open, safe place to learn without judgement or fear.”
LGBT120
“He showed a class of minors a video about an older man sexually assaulting a 17 year old.”
LGBT120
“Reading around 50-80 pages a week depending on the week.”
ADMJ120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One hybrid-online ADMJ review , and an accommodating instructor.

Main concern

Only one tagged online review limits confidence in online policy details.

What students said

“Pretty easy class overall and he knows what he is talking about.”
ADMJ120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments look standard with quizzes, exams, discussions, and .

QuizzesExamsDiscussion BoardsHomework Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention homework, participation, guest speakers, field trip, and tests but .

ParticipationHomeworkGuest SpeakersTests Mentioned
“You will learn a lot if you actually do the work and participate in class.”
LGBT120
“one for HW the other for the midterm and final”
ADMJ120

Online

Hybrid online , and an exam.

Weekly LectureDiscussion BoardChapter QuizzesExam
“One hour lecture a week with an exam and . Typical read chapter and do a quiz.”
ADMJ120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr. Miraglia was an incredible teacher who made learning so much fun. , and made sure not to just assign "busy work".”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, balancing strong lecture praise against workload complaints and one severe content flag. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“He is active and engaging when he teaches, and welcomes questions and discussion among his students.”

⚠️ Content Concern

20/100

“He showed a class of minors a video about an older man sexually assaulting a 17 year old.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

72/100

“Awsome man. He is funny, he listens, he makes the material interesting and for that I learned a lot. Highly recomended.”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“Reading around 60-70 pages a week, and only 3 units?”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are enticing, he brings a lot of local community groups to guest speak.
  • makes you think alot.. I love him he is such a cool guy and very passionate
  • Wants to see you succeed. Do the work and youll pass its not too hard

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • i would not consider this class easy. but if you work hard and put out a lot of effort you will do well.
  • Grades HW rather strange, 1 week get all of the be a drastic change
  • Pretty easy class overall and he knows what he is talking about.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • This was done without permission, and had little to no educational value.
  • If you dont like the typical cop mentality, he is not for you.
  • he is a non-factor in the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews over two decades show mostly positive teaching praise but include older sparse comments and one serious recent outlier.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

LGBT1207 reviews
ADMJ1204 reviews
ADMJ1 review
ADMJ1231 review
CRIMJUS1 review
Show 1 more courses
INTROTOADMIN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values