Gregory Miraglia

LGBT120 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 48/100
RMP rating: 3.3/5
Take again: 50%
Difficulty: 3.3

The decision

if you want an engaged LGBT studies class and ; otherwise the risk profile is too uneven.

Best fit · Effort For RewardReading HeavyParticipation MattersCaring When EngagedField Trip CoursePolarizing

, and memorable for LGBT120 with a Castro field trip.
, and one severe misconduct allegation.
, and participation matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Grades reported from A to C-; , and participation mean an A takes consistent effort.

and assignments; and posts.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, but volume of , and writing makes it more than a light elective.

In person emphasizes lecture attention and field trip; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation matters for success.

In person is clearly mandatory; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Two strong recommenders clash with a and a mediocre online experience.

Positive energy is mostly in person; online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Clear criteria and , but and lower grades show no free ride.

Format shift

Tough grader tag appears in person; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and participation create steady load.

Format shift

Online highlights so many papers; in person stresses weekly reading and field trip prep.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students find him caring and excellent; others report weak Zoom engagement or serious boundary concerns.

Format shift

In-person reviews are split extreme; online is lukewarm.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reading responses, writing posts, papers, quizzes, and participation dominate more than a .

Format shift

Both formats center weekly work; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

field trip to a harsh accusation about inappropriate classroom media; participation and reading still drive the grade.

Main concern

One serious misconduct claim and .

What students said

“ .”
LGBT120

“There are textbook”
LGBT120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online section relied on long videos, reading, posts, and papers; and a .

Main concern

and writing with weak live instruction support.

What students said

“You simply needed to read and watch multiple hour videos of the topic of the week.”
LGBT120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes tied to reading and .

Reading-based testsQuizzesWriting-heavy assessments

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students say you must read and pay attention to be prepared for tests; no explicit closed-book or software details.

Reading for testsParticipation

“You have to read and pay attention in class to be prepared for the tests.”
LGBT120

Online

Online assessment centers on posts, short writing, and quizzes after long weekly videos; .

Weekly posts1-3 writing tasksQuizzes

“You would then do a post, average of 1-3 writing and quizzes.”
LGBT120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ . The class was also a favorite.”
Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in and trust concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

📖

30/100

“You simply needed to read and watch multiple hour videos of the topic of the week.”

❤️ Caring Classroom

75/100

“He is so caring for his students and respects all input we have in class.”

🚨 Trust Red Flag

15/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

He is so caring for his students
he canceled them
He is just a really great person and cares about people.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

Get ready to read
So many papers
There are textbook

Theme 3

🚩 Contested Reputation

.
Honestly a well rounded and respected person.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with conflicting extremes, including a serious allegation, make the sample informative but unstable.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 51

Course coverage

LGBT1204 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

A 1

B range

B 1

C range

C- 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1

Gregory Miraglia

x x x if you want an engaged LGBT studies class and x x x x; otherwise the risk profile is too uneven.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Standard

Mandatory

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

📖 x x x x

❤️ Caring Classroom

🚨 Trust Red Flag

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

🚩 Contested Reputation

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want an engaged LGBT studies class and ; otherwise the risk profile is too uneven.

📖