AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Andrew DeLunas

PHIL121 · PHIL120 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

on your critical-thinking GE if you do not need rigorous philosophy training.

Best fit · Easy A HunterGraded by few thingsClear grading criteriaEasy A for GEHilarious and passionateMultiple-attempt quizzes
  • Only graded on about four items (three
  • Extremely light workload and near-guaranteed A if you complete the
  • learners

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Nearly every student reports an A or A+ and .

Evidence is almost entirely from Online reviews; the single In person review also says only four graded items.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

Content is light GE philosophy supported by videos, and students call it simple rather than intellectually demanding.

Online and In person comments both describe a simple, low-difficulty course.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Most reviews and optional Zoom meetings.

; In person attendance detail is not provided.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

100% would take again and every review is a 5 for quality, especially for easy GE credit.

Strong recommendation holds for Online; In person has only one glowing short review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

93/100

, and reported grades cluster at A or A+.

Format shift

Online comments give the ; In person only notes four assignments.

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

Semester-long work is essentially three quizzes and .

Format shift

Consistent across Online reviews; In person agrees on four graded items.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students , and clear, though deep learning is optional.

Format shift

Online reviews carry the personality detail; In person is brief praise only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grade rests on a few quizzes and .

Format shift

; In person only says four assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Single older in-person review echoes the and strong praise.

Main concern

, so format-specific detail is limited.

What students said

“Awesome professor!!!! Only grades by 4 assignments”
PHIL120

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online PHIL120/121 is a low-stakes GE with three MC quizzes (multiple attempts, , and lots of YouTube or recorded lectures.

Main concern

, and passive students may learn little if .

What students said

“You're only graded based on four things - three MC quizzes (2-3 attempts, takes highest score) and a .”
PHIL121
“I took him online for summer 2020, you are literally graded by 4 things.”
PHIL120
“This and was only based on a few assignments.”
PHIL120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is a handful of multi-attempt quizzes plus one end-of-term essay, with little proctoring detail mentioned.

Multiple-attempt MC quizzesHighest score keptOne final essayOptional discussions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Only evidence is that grading is based on four assignments; .

Four graded assignments
“Only grades by 4 assignments”
PHIL120

Online

Three MC quizzes with 2-3 attempts taking the ; discussions and Zoom are optional.

Multiple-attempt quizzesHighest attempt keptFinal essayOptional discussions
“three MC quizzes (2-3 attempts, takes highest score) and a ”
PHIL121
“3 MC Quizzes (two attempts, takes highest attempt) and 1 essay due at the end of the term”
PHIL120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You're only graded based on four things - three MC quizzes (2-3 attempts, takes highest score) and a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (5 Online, 1 In and light workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“As a person, wonderful. He is so funny and passionate about his work.”

🅰️ Easy A Reality

95/100

“you are literally graded by 4 things. 3 MC Quizzes (two attempts, takes highest attempt) and 1 essay”

👍 Recommendation

96/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Lightness

92/100

“This and was only based on a few assignments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is so funny and passionate about his work
  • Accessible outside class
  • Modules had a lot of sources, like YouTube videos

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • only based on a few assignments
  • Graded by few things
  • A if you want to fulfill a critical thinking requirement

Theme 3

⚠️ Learning Caveats

  • if you prefer a more rigorous or mentally demanding course, then maybe this isn't the fit
  • if you actually want to learn about philosophy, don't depend on it
  • has little instructions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six consistently glowing reviews from 2020-2025 with , but small sample and only one In person review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1205 reviews
PHIL1211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values