AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Gerardine Lamble

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can fully teach yourself from the textbook; this one review paints a poor guided-learning experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-guided onlyUnhelpful when askedUnclear expectationsHeavy textbook readingNot beginner-friendly CS
  • Single review describes a self-guided online programming course with little instructor help.
  • Expectations and ; .
  • Student found a basic programming course very difficult due to structure, not just content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

The student earned a B but describes a very difficult basic programming course with and .

All evidence is from the single online review; no in-person data.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Described as very difficult for a basic-level and full textbook dependence.

Difficulty assessment comes only from one online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

.

Only online evidence; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The only review is strongly negative on help, clarity, and structure, with .

Recommendation is based solely on the online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Student received a B, but generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of homework and .

Format shift

Workload described only in the online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Professor was never , and the course felt self-guided.

Format shift

Teaching quality evidence is entirely from the single online review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grade appears driven by textbook-based projects and .

Format shift

; online review focuses on projects and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online programming section felt entirely self-taught with , and full textbook chapters required for projects.

Main concern

No real teaching support and .

What students said

“Course was basically self-guided. Professor was never helpful when asked a question. and certain expectations.”
73264

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment discussion centers on projects.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The only online review ; work is described as projects from textbook chapters.

Project-based submissionsTextbook chapter reading
“ of what she wanted to say, then you have to read the entire textbook chapter to know how to submit projects.”
73264

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Course was basically self-guided. Professor was never helpful when asked a question. and certain expectations.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review only; themes reflect limited evidence. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Self-Guided With Little Help

15/100

“Course was basically self-guided. .”

📚 Textbook-Only Structure

25/100

“ of what she wanted to say, then you have to read the entire textbook chapter to know how to submit projects.”

⚠️ Basic CS Feels Too Hard

25/100

“Very difficult for a basic level programming course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • of what she wanted to say

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very difficult for a basic level programming course.
  • you have to read the entire textbook chapter to .

Theme 3

📋 About Expectations

  • and certain expectations.
  • Course was basically self-guided.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2023 online review exists, so conclusions are highly uncertain and may not generalize.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

732641 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values