AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nick Miller

MATH232 · MATH121 · MATH9466035 · MATH941286 · MATH221 · MATH120 · MATH94 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid if if you can fully teach yourself the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teach requiredTough graderOff-topic lecturesHomework mismatchSlow grading
  • Dominant theme is that he knows math but cannot teach it clearly.
  • Students often self-teach; homework and .
  • Online , and harsh grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

, and unless you already know the material.

Both online and ; online adds failing homework averages and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students rate difficulty high because poor delivery forces self-teaching beyond normal course load.

Difficulty feels high in both formats; online especially warns against taking him remotely.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Participation is treated as mandatory; skip-class warnings and .

In person stresses participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and most comments urge avoiding him for .

; in-person has a few older positive notes but still mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and quizzes, and even simple homework averaging F signal harsh scoring.

Format shift

; online mentions slow inaccurate Canvas grades.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and self-teaching on top of lectures pile up.

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

tangents, redone problems, and students learning from peers instead.

Format shift

Poor teaching dominates both formats; a .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Tests, labs, checkpoints, and .

Format shift

Online highlights pop quizzes and checkpoints; in person stresses tests and labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person he is often described as , and a .

Main concern

, and wasted class time.

What students said

“Professor Miller understands Statistics, but he doesn't know how to teach it.”
MATH232
“Basically he doesn't teach. He has no organization or curriculum.”
MATH221
“Unless you're a !!”
MATH94

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and failing-average homework scores.

Main concern

Slow responses, inaccurate Canvas grades, and .

What students said

“ if it is online. Professor is a terrible teacher and grades the .”
MATH94
“showing up to class .”
MATH232
“Gave a .... very simple.. average score was an F. .... what?”
MATH941286

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and tests feel hard, timed, and poorly matched to taught material, with little student-friendly flexibility.

Tough GradingPop QuizzesShort Timed QuizzesLabsMisaligned Homework

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests are tough, often unlike homework, with short quiz times and .

Tough GraderShort Timed QuizzesHard LabsTests Unlike Homework
“he is a and especially LABS.”
MATH232
“ . Avoid if pos.”
MATH121
“Times for the . Get ready to teach yourself the material!”
MATH941286

Online

, and pop quizzes that cannot be made up.

Pop QuizzesSlow GradingHarsh Homework Scoring
“ and can't be taken at a later date, even for the reasons of grieving a loved one.”
MATH232
“Gave a .... very simple.. average score was an F. .... what?”
MATH941286

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Miller understands Statistics, but he doesn't know how to teach it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, , and harsh grading. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

22/100

“He knows the material but is terrible at teaching it.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ if it is online.”

⚖️

22/100

“Extremely hard grader, a horrible lecturer, has students teach themselves.”

📚

20/100

“Gonna have to teach yourself to pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he has no idea how to teach it
  • He's basically just going off the top of his head.
  • Spends maybe 30min going over material, and the other 30min doing group work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • average score was an F. .... what?

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Experience

  • How does someone manage to say so much yet so little?
  • I was lost from day 1 in this class
  • Unless you're a !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

22 reviews over many years with consistent complaints about teaching and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH948 reviews
MATH2325 reviews
MATH9412863 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
941 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1211 review
MATH2211 review
MATH94660351 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 3

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1