AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Diane Vandeusen

MATH · MATH235 · MATH232 · MATHEMATICS · STATS232 · STAT232 · MATH108 · MATH120 · MATH94 · CALCULUS1 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you can teach yourself from the book and handle a demanding math workload; many recent students advise picking someone else.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing instructorTough and demandingHeavy homeworkSelf-study often requiredUnorganized recent lectures
  • older fans call her inspiring and clear; and unhelpful.
  • Difficulty runs high with lots of homework and limited leniency for many students.
  • ; independent self-teachers cope better than students needing structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough-grader tags, no-leniency comments, and and no slack.

Almost all grade-effort evidence is in person; the one online review does not claim an easy A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

High difficulty ratings and repeated notes that math is hard, fast, and unforgiving if you fall behind.

In-person reviews dominate and consistently call content hard; online also notes heavy material.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and you will not pass; others say lectures are not mandatory.

In-person evidence conflicts; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Would-take-again is about 40%, and several recent detailed reviews explicitly say pick another teacher.

The single online review recommends her; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

and comments that you should not expect leniency; some guaranteed-C redesign exceptions exist.

Format shift

Strict .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and comments that she gives a lot and you cannot slack.

Format shift

Both formats mention work-heavy load; in-person is more detailed.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Long-run praise for passion and clarity is offset by strong recent complaints about disorganization and little help.

Format shift

Online sample is positive; .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Weekly online assignments, quizzes, exams, and MyStatLab-style work all matter.

Format shift

, and online HW; online review focuses on overall workload.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many older reviews praise passion and , while several newer ones say lectures are messy and .

Main concern

Recent students report unorganized lectures that cover little of the .

What students said

“She's a bad instructor. . ... Be prepared to teach yourself or better yet pick another teacher!!”
MATH232
“Ms V is very clear on what she expects from her students I never had to look at the book because her notes are that clear”
MATH232

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

charismatic, caring, and material-rich though work-heavy.

Main concern

Still described as work heavy with a large amount of material.

What students said

“I really enjoyed taking her class, it's a bit work heavy but that's expected. you can tell that she really cares about her students”
MATH232

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard math quiz and ; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Pop quizzesExamsOnline homeworkMyStatLab assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention quizzes, exams, and .

Pop quizzesExamsOnline assignments
“Whats in the notes is enough to prepare you for the the test and hw”
MATH232
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH232

Online

Single online .

Work-heavy material
“She covers a lot of material, yet she makes sure that you have all the materials to understand the work.”
MATH232

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to teach yourself or better yet pick another teacher!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews (1 online, 18 in person), highlighting polarized teaching and hard math demand. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Organization Issues

30/100

“ . Biggest complaint is the random lectures she puts out whenever she feels like it.”

🔥 High Demand

28/100

“you cannot slack off what so ever.”

❤️ Supportive Side

70/100

“If I had questions she was always available whether it'd be after class or during office hours”

👎

36/100

“Do not expect leniency at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were all over the place but .
  • she is the
  • she makes the class so difficult its rediculous.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if you wanna get an A.
  • her classes are tough and she demands greatness.
  • Basically as long as you finish all the guaranteed a C.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • I ultimately and she gives a lot!
  • there are
  • it's a bit work heavy but that's expected.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews spanning many years with rich detail; opinions conflict by era, but sample size and consistency within recent years support a solid read.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH2328 reviews
MATH943 reviews
CALCULUS11 review
MATH1 review
MATH1081 review
Show 5 more courses
MATH1201 review
MATH2351 review
MATHEMATICS1 review
STAT2321 review
STATS2321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values