AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Carla Golder

DART120 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you already know Adobe tools well and ; otherwise skip.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear instructionsLots of homeworkHarsh perfectionist gradingBetter in personConfusing grading criteria
  • Students struggle with and .
  • Heavy textbook-style homework load with little live teaching support.
  • Online format is especially confusing; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn As, but and and unpredictable.

Both formats report grading stress; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Adobe software work and textbook-driven projects feel hard without prior design experience.

Online reviews stress self-teaching software; in-person still calls the class serious and homework-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews split between mandatory and .

In-person evidence is mixed; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

One student liked quick help and clear criteria, but and .

The ; the online review is clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students describe intense perfectionist grading and .

Format shift

Harsh or and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple reviews flag lots of homework and continuous textbook-driven assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

and limited help, with only one clearly positive teaching report.

Format shift

Online help felt weak; and active.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grade rests mainly on textbook assignments and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person sections still draw complaints about intense perfectionist grading and .

Main concern

and overly perfectionist even when assignments are doable.

What students said

“ and make sure you check in with her to make sure you fully understand”
DART120
“ and undefined, up to instructor's preferences.”
DART120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online DART120 felt unclear and unsupportive despite learning some Adobe tools.

Main concern

Online instructions alone are not clear enough for design software without live help.

What students said

“It was very hard for me to do this via online instructions because .”
DART120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on assignments and projects; .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and make sure you check in with her to make sure you fully understand Everything is by the book but she feels the need to grade pretty intensely and looks at your end result being absolute perfection”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Clarity

32/100

“ . , however not very helpful even when it came to minor things.”

📚

28/100

“Lots of homework”

⚖️

28/100

“ and undefined, up to instructor's preferences.”

👍 Conditional Support

42/100

“Professor Golder is very active and if you have questions. She helped me.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This is the type of class that should be taken in person

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • grade pretty intensely and looks at your end result being absolute perfection
  • and undefined
  • and easily accomplished

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • Everything is textbook work that she posts online with assignments
  • Works mostly entirely out of book except for 1 or 2 larger projects

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews spanning 2014-2020 with mixed detail; tone is mostly consistent but sample size is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

DART1204 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values