AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Deborah Grenn

HUMA151 · SPCH122 · HUMAN104 · HUMA104 · HUMA101 · HUM185 · PHIL134 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take her if you want a light humanities grade and can handle open discussion; skip if .

Best fit · Easy A HunterPolarizing personalityEasy gradesParticipation heavyVague instructionsBelief-driven lectures
  • Grades and content are generally easy, but instruction and .
  • Students either find her inspiring and caring or boring and confrontational when beliefs clash.
  • Attendance and outspoken participation .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Multiple students call it an easy A or easy score with light work, so a high grade usually costs little academic struggle.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is described as a breeze with movies and simple work, though some wanted deeper or more expected religion comparison.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance is marked mandatory in one review and tags warn you will not pass if .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

fans call her life-changing, critics call her horrible or boring.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students repeatedly say scores come easy and work is graded lightly, though .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

74/100

Work is called super easy with movies and limited tasks, though one class required four presentations and active talk.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Praise for caring lectures and inspiration sits beside strong complaints about boredom, tech struggles, and confrontational tone.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment centers on participation, presentations, and sparse graded items more than heavy formal exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person humanities and philosophy sections feel easy and discussion-heavy, with strong praise for warmth mixed with complaints about boredom, bias, and .

Main concern

and discomfort when students disagree with her views.

What students said

“I LOVED her class. Outstanding teacher and a .”
HUMA101
“I went the whole semester without knowing my grade or even what I was being graded on.”
PHIL134
“This class was definitely an easy A, too bad we never really focused on religion.”
PHIL134

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize participation and presentations more than formal exam logistics, with .

Participation heavyPresentationsFew graded items

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections stress participation and presentations; .

Participation heavyPresentationsFew graded items
“We had 4 presentations for the semester!”
PHIL134
“I went the whole semester without knowing my grade or even what I was being graded on.”
PHIL134

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I LOVED her class. Outstanding teacher and a . You will learn all kinds of different cultures and beliefs in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews, highlighting mixed teaching praise, easy grades, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“One of the . Good lectures, great movies, awesome guest speakers.”

📈 Easy Grades

82/100

“This class was definitely an easy A, too bad we never really focused on religion.”

⚠️ Polarizing Personality

40/100

“She gives a false sense of acceptance until someone disagrees with her beliefs, then she calls them out without hesitation.”

🗣️ Participation Matters

28/100

“This class requires a lot of if your shy and not opinionated.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Outstanding teacher and a .
  • boring teacher. seems like she talked a lot about her beliefs.
  • Good lectures, great movies, awesome guest speakers.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class was definitely an easy A
  • It is easy to get the score, furthermore, the teacher is nice!
  • This class is a breeze. She's so sweet.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity and Fit

  • I went the whole semester without knowing my grade or even what I was being graded on.
  • She can be vague at times with her instructions, but the class is pretty easy.
  • She is a very nice teacher. Sometimes a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten mostly older in-person reviews span many years with mixed detail and mixed opinions, so the signal is usable but not fully current.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL1343 reviews
HUMA1012 reviews
HUM1851 review
HUMA1041 review
HUMA1511 review
Show 2 more courses
HUMAN1041 review
SPCH1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values