Guy Brookshire

ENGL125 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 52/100
RMP rating: 4.0/5
Take again: 0%
Difficulty: 4.0

The decision

if you enjoy discussion-heavy critical thinking .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPhilosophy-English hybridLecture heavyParticipation heavyFew graded assignmentsInteresting topics

Hybrid philosophy/English focus with strong critical thinking emphasis
but heavy in-class participation
Interesting topics

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Student got an A with , but high participation and quality 4 suggest real in-class effort.

Evidence is from the single in-person review only.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty rated 4 with philosophy-style critical thinking and lecture-heavy content.

Evidence is from the single in-person review only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and in-class participation is a core demand.

Evidence is from the single in-person review only.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Topics and teaching rate well, but the .

Evidence is from the single in-person review only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Few graded items and an A were possible, but .

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Workload

Light

70/100

Only three graded assignments and .

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Quality 4 with interesting topics and a .

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

and little homework.

Format shift

In-person evidence only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENGL125 feels like a philosophy/English hybrid: lecture heavy, few graded assignments, lots of in-class participation, interesting topics.

Main concern

High participation demand and .

What students said

“More like a philosophy/english hybrid course. The critical thinking aspect of the class was emphasized much more than the english aspect, as we only had 3 graded assignments.”
ENGL125

“Just be prepared to do a lot .”
ENGL125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment centers on few graded items plus participation.

Few graded assignmentsParticipation based

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; three graded assignments and heavy in-class participation define the course.

Graded by few thingsLecture heavyIn-class participation

“we only had 3 graded assignments. Very interesting topics. Just be prepared to do a lot .”
ENGL125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“More like a philosophy/english hybrid course. The critical thinking aspect of the class was emphasized much more than the english aspect, as we only had 3 graded assignments.”
Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting hybrid content and participation load. Credibility rating: Low.

🧠 Critical Thinking Focus

72/100

“The critical thinking aspect of the class was emphasized much more than the english aspect, as we only had 3 graded assignments.”

🗣️

70/100

“Just be prepared to do a lot .”

🤷

42/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

More like a philosophy/english hybrid course.
Very interesting topics.
Lecture heavy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

we only had 3 graded assignments
Course DIFFICULTY rating: 4
A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

24/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2020 review with solid detail but no second opinion or longer track record.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 51

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

A 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Guy Brookshire

x x if you enjoy discussion-heavy critical thinking x x x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Challenging

Mandatory

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🧠 Critical Thinking Focus

🗣️ x x x

🤷 x x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you enjoy discussion-heavy critical thinking .

🗣️

🤷