Maryanne Valch

MATH9051626 · MATH94 · MATH90 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 12/100
RMP rating: 1.1/5
Take again: 0%
Difficulty: 4.7

The decision

Avoid unless you already excel at math and can teach yourself the entire course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandDoes Not TeachTough GraderLots of HomeworkMust Self-Teach

Students overwhelmingly call her one of the .
Thick accent and quiet delivery make lectures nearly impossible to follow.
Heavy homework on untaught material plus .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Tough grading, test-heavy structure, and lots of .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Students rate difficulty very high and say content is hard when lectures fail to teach it.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and every detailed comment urges students not to enroll.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and failing-to-teach reports point to unforgiving grading.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

LOTS OF and comments about work on untaught topics show a crushing load.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students cite unintelligible lectures, errors on the board, anger at questions, and almost no real teaching.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews combine heavy homework with assignments.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math sections are described as confusing, poorly taught, and .

Main concern

Accent and alone.

What students said

“Honestly one of the . She gets mad when ppl ask questions & they still don't understand.”
MATH94

“She's the so far. She's hard to understand and doesn't teach well.”
MATH90

“If you are not good . If you must take her class, plan on teaching yourself.”
MATH90

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Comments stress tough, test-heavy assessment without clear open-book or special proctoring details.

Test HeavyIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly describe open-book, take-home, or proctoring tools.

Test HeavyIn-Person Exams

“ ”
MATH90

“ unless you're good at math!”
MATH94

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Honestly one of the . She gets mad when ppl ask questions & they still don't understand.”
Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews spanning 2014-2017, highlighting teaching failure and . Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She's the so far. She's hard to understand and doesn't teach well.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“ .”

📚 Self-Teaching Required

20/100

“If .”

Theme 1

🗣️ About Clarity & Accent

She was really hard to understand. She had a really thick accent and spoke really quietly.
It's really hard to understand what she's talking about.
She taught in Europe so her accent is extremely hard to understand.

Theme 2

📉 About Teaching Quality

Honestly one of the .
She doesn't teach a lot.
Student kept having to correct her on mistakes she made during a lecture.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload & Grades

She always assigns hw to stuff she didn't teach in class.
If you are not good .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six consistently negative in-person reviews from 2014-2017 are detailed but somewhat dated.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH904 reviews

MATH90516261 review

MATH941 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not_Sure_Yet 1