AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

A McConnell

MATH106 · MATH105 · MATH108 · MATH90 · TRIG · MATH94 · ASSEMBLY · TRIGONOMETRY · COMS215 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Skip him if ; take him only if and use the open-notes page.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-Teach RequiredFast LecturesNotes Allowed on TestsBoringTest Heavy
  • Many students say lectures are too fast, low volume, and
  • A , but teaching quality is uneven and often frustrating
  • the material

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Open notes on tests and homework-based exams help, but outside self-study.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Material is standard precalc or trig, but pacing and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and full-period lectures with little flexibility.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

About half would not recommend him, with many urging alternatives unless you already know the content.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One full page of notes on tests and , but some still call tests nonsense.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Lots of homework tags plus electronic homework and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Many students report fast , impatience with questions, and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests and and quizzes.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math students split between a minority who call him fine if you work hard and a majority , and forces self-teaching.

Main concern

Fast unclear lectures plus mandatory attendance for little instructional value.

What students said

“ unless .”
MATH108
“I'm currently having to pre-cal because he goes so fast”
MATH108
“Not a good teacher + condescending.”
MATH106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams usually allow one full page of notes and .

One Page Open NotesTests From HomeworkCumulative FinalElectronic Homework

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests commonly allow an 8x10 or 8.5x11 notes page and .

One Page Open NotesTests From HomeworkCumulative Final
“he lets you use 8"x11" sheet of and final.”
MATH108
“Lets you use one 8x10 page of notes front and back.”
MATH106
“ because they come from the .”
MATH108

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless .”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting self-teaching needs and open-notes exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“Hands down one of the .”

📘

70/100

“he lets you use 8"x11" sheet of and final.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ unless you are very confident in pre calc.”

📚 Self-Teaching Required

38/100

“I'm currently having to pre-cal because he goes so fast”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • explaining through a math problem at his own pace (read: too fast and to low to hear clearly)
  • This teacher hates to answer questions asked by the students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Be aware that homework and
  • Lets you use one 8x10 page of notes front and back
  • There will be 7 or 8 problems on the test, so if you miss 2 you're screwed

Theme 3

🧭

  • If you learn fast and can handle tedious learning, he's the professor for you
  • if you aren't skilled in math
  • Just do the work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-four reviews over many years show a stable pattern of weak teaching with .

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 59
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH10613 reviews
MATH10810 reviews
MATH943 reviews
MATH902 reviews
1061 review
Show 5 more courses
ASSEMBLY1 review
COMS2151 review
MATH1051 review
TRIG1 review
TRIGONOMETRY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1