AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Yolanda Woods

MATH106 · MATH121 · MATH90 · MATH120 · MATH94 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate a rude, error-prone lecture style with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude and CondescendingLecture Mistakes ConstantlyHeavy MyMathLab LoadGrades Notes StrictlySelf-Teach Required
  • Most students call her the rudeness and constant lecture mistakes.
  • Workload is heavy with MyMathLab, worksheets, graded notes, and folders, while .
  • A few students , but the and self-teach.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some say an A is reachable if you grind MyMathLab and self-study, but and many still struggle for solid grades.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is often basic math, but fast pacing, mistakes, and should.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory, and graded notes or classwork punish missing class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly every review , and wasted time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students report , and little flexibility on late work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Heavy MyMathLab, weekly worksheets, graded folders, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is full of mistakes, condescension, and students teaching themselves.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of and worksheets, plus midterms and tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as chaotic, rude, and overloaded with MyMathLab and graded notes, forcing many students to teach themselves.

Main concern

Constant lecture mistakes, condescending tone, and .

What students said

“She makes endless mistakes every single lecture.”
MATH106
“Save yourself a ”
MATH90
“By FAR the .”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and often feel hard or poorly prepared for, with .

In-Person TestsHard if UnpreparedMismatched PrepMyMathLab

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and midterms are common; students say and prep is often inadequate.

In-Person TestsHard if UnpreparedNo Clear Review Guide
“Tests hard if you didnt study.”
MATH90
“Never gives adequate preparation for tests such as a review guide”
MATH106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are no good at math.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching errors, rudeness, and . Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She is easily the .”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Overload

22/100

“the hw was overload and the ”

😤 Classroom Climate

15/100

“Constantly talks down to students, makes mistakes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes endless mistakes every single lecture.
  • Pretty much taught myself the entire semester.
  • She teaches like a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • getting an A is not hard as long as you TRY
  • The class is super easy to pass though. Just do the homework and you're good.
  • 10% of your grade is based on how well your notes are.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is rude to students for no reason
  • Degraded students when they asked questions.
  • but she's really rude.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty detailed in-person reviews over several years show highly consistent negative themes on teaching and workload.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 516

Course coverage

MATH9013 reviews
MATH1209 reviews
MATH1064 reviews
MATH1213 reviews
MATH941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1