AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jose Rico

MATH106 · MATH94 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

experiences range from highly recommended to truly awful depending on the course and term.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing reviewsUnprepared lecturesLast-minute grade changesCares in some coursesEngineering background
  • Reviews split between awful lectures and
  • Another praises care, engineering background, and student success focus

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned an A, but another reported last-minute reweighting of tests and the final, so the path to an A is uncertain.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings split between 2 and 4 across two math courses, so content challenge is inconsistent.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

One review highly recommends him while the other warns that lectures and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

One student earned an A, but another reported the of class.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews emphasize lecture quality and tests more than assignment volume.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Students describe both terrible, unprepared lectures and strong, caring instruction.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments highlight previous tests and the final as major grade drivers.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one student reports unprepared lectures and , while another calls him awesome and highly recommendable.

Main concern

Lecture quality and .

What students said

“he is truelly aweful as a teacher. The lectures are terrible”
MATH94
“Awesome Teacher. Engineering background. Knows his stuff. Cares about students and their success. .”
MATH106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and a final matter a lot, but reviews .

Tests and final heavily weighted

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention tests and a details.

Tests and final heavily weightedLast-day grading change
“He changed the grading system on the last day of class to make previous tests and the .”
MATH94

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Seemed like a good teacher the first few weeks of the semester, but he is truelly aweful as a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting split teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Teaching Consistency

48/100

“The lectures are terrible, and honestly it seemed as though he had just thrown some slop together 5 minutes before class started.”

👍 Positive Experience

80/100

“Awesome Teacher. Engineering background. Knows his stuff.”

⚖️

42/100

“He changed the grading system on the last day of class to make previous tests and the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures are terrible
  • Awesome Teacher. Engineering background. Knows his stuff.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He changed the
  • Cares about students and their success. .

Theme 3

💔 Mixed Reputation

  • he is truelly aweful as a teacher
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews with sharply conflicting experiences and limited grade detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1061 review
MATH941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values