AI Rate Professor

Communication

William Wrenn

COMMS215 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

; expect no support and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpfulBoring VideosConfusing AssignmentsFail-Designed TestsNo Learning
  • Single review reports almost no learning and no help when asked.
  • Assignments and and set up to fail.
  • Students must rely on outside sources instead of class materials.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

The and assignments seem designed to fail students.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty is rated 4 and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Described as a horrible experience with nothing learned and no help offered.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Tests are described as designed to fail students, implying harsh outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Volume is not detailed; the .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Boring videos and no help force students to learn from outside sources.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Both assignments and tests are mentioned as .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The sole in-person COMMS215 review describes a useless, unhelpful course with boring videos.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Horrible experience with this teacher. I really didn't learn anything from the class.”
COMMS215
“ and .”
COMMS215

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and designed to fail, with no supporting detail on open-book rules.

Confusing TestsFail-Oriented Design

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and assignments are described as confusing and unfair.

Confusing TestsFail-Oriented Design
“ and .”
COMMS215

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible experience with this teacher. I really didn't learn anything from the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

22/100

“His videos are terribly boring. Did not provide any help when asked.”

🚫 Recommendation

15/100

“I had to use outside sources.”

🧨 Assessment Risk

28/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • didn't learn anything from the class
  • videos are terribly boring
  • said to figure out it on my own

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I had to use outside sources

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2015 review with no corroborating sample; but not robust.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMMS2151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values