AI Rate Professor

English

Patrick Vogelpohl

HIST120 · ENGL120 · ENG90 · ENG125 · ENG120 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

Take him for any English writing class if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEssay coachHilarious lecturerDraft feedback kingWants you to passNo busywork
  • All 10 reviews are perfect 5s with low difficulty and strong praise for personality.
  • and almost no busywork.
  • He is generous and will help you improve writing until you succeed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

, but he reviews drafts, wants you to pass, and has even passed students who felt they earned an F.

Both online and and ; reported As come from online.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Content stays basics-focused with low difficulty ratings and .

Online and low difficulty scores.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; one online ENG125 review explicitly says attendance was mandatory.

Only the online ENG125 ; in-person evidence is sparse.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Every review is a perfect 5 with , and tops.

Online and quality scores.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

He revises drafts with you and has been described as giving a passing grade when the student felt they earned an F.

Format shift

Leniency appears in both formats, with the strongest pass-forgiving quote from in-person ENG90.

Workload

Light

78/100

Assessment is mainly essays plus a few conferences or a quiz, with multiple students praising no stupid busywork.

Format shift

Online reviews most explicitly celebrate no busywork; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and eager to help with writing.

Format shift

In-person reviews stress classroom energy; online reviews stress draft coaching and clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades are driven by essays and .

Format shift

Online ENG125 spells out five essays, conferences, a post, and a quiz; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students call him witty, charismatic, and and strong willingness to help you pass.

Main concern

Essay performance still drives the grade, so weak writers need .

What students said

“ ! He is witty and hilarious.”
ENG120
“What I like about his class is how he reviews rough drafts of essay. .”
ENG90
“Although I did not deserve the grade I got...which was a passing grade when I clearly earned a F.”
ENG90

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students , and zero busywork, with grades based on essays, conferences, a post, and a quiz.

Main concern

and limited live personality compared with in-person.

What students said

“NO STUPID BUSYWORK! and he helped improve my writing.”
ENG125
“ and will allow many drafts to make sure you get it as good as you want it to be.”
ENGL120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and light or no traditional closed exams described.

Essay-based gradeMultiple draft reviewsMinimal quiz loadNo busywork

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; little closed-book exam detail is given.

Essay-focusedRough draft review
“Our so make sure you do well on them.”
ENG90
“What I like about his class is how he reviews rough drafts of essay.”
ENG90

Online

, and a quiz with multi-draft support.

EssaysConferencesQuizMulti-draft feedback
“The grade , and a quiz.”
ENG125
“ and will allow many drafts.”
ENGL120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This guy is tops.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (2 online, 8 in , and lenient support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ ! He is witty and hilarious.”

📝 Draft Support

92/100

“ and will allow many drafts to make sure you get it as good as you want it to be.”

⚖️

90/100

“Although I did not deserve the grade I got...which was a passing grade when I clearly earned a F.”

🧹 Workload Reality

78/100

“NO STUPID BUSYWORK!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • What makes this teacher awesome is how enthusiastic he is about teaching.
  • Very funny and engaging teaching style.
  • He is witty and hilarious.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Our so make sure you do well on them.
  • NO STUPID BUSYWORK!
  • Although I did not deserve the grade I got...which was a passing grade when I clearly earned a F.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • .
  • He assisted me with a .
  • ;)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Ten uniformly glowing reviews span 2009-2015 with rich detail, but all are older and .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1203 reviews
ENG903 reviews
ENGL1202 reviews
ENG1251 review
HIST1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values