AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Brenda Tucker

COUN062 · PSYCHOLOGY125 · PSYC125 · PSYCH125 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an engaging psych section and can handle uneven help and personal digressions.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMixed reviewsOpen-book testsPersonal storiesInteresting when goodUnhelpful at times
  • Reviews split between highly engaging and unhelpful or unprofessional
  • Some students praise subject knowledge while others prefer the textbook alone

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

At least one A appears, but as difficult interpretive work.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty sits around moderate with content that can engage or frustrate depending on the student.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Some students wish they could take more classes with her while .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Assignments are described as clear, and one student earned an A .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Assignments and than extreme busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Strong subject knowledge and engagement for some students, poor help and professionalism for others.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person psych and counseling classes range from highly interesting to unhelpful, with and occasional oversharing.

Main concern

Inconsistent helpfulness and boundary concerns about personal client stories.

What students said

“Professor knew subject matter and kept me interested.”
PSYCH125
“ as this is one of those interpret Emersons veiw of X episode kinds of teachers.”
PSYC125
“She gives out too much personal information about her therapy clients to the students in her class.”
PSYCH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are open book but still challenging interpretive questions rather than simple look-ups.

Open book testsInterpretive questions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

pure memorization.

Open book testsInterpretive questions
“ as this is one of those interpret Emersons veiw of X episode kinds of teachers.”
PSYC125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor knew subject matter and kept me interested. I found myself waiting to attend her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person , and professionalism concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Engagement

70/100

“Professor knew subject matter and kept me interested. I found myself waiting to attend her class.”

📖 Open-Book Difficulty

72/100

“ as this is one of those interpret Emersons veiw of X episode kinds of teachers.”

⚠️ Boundary Concerns

30/100

“She gives out too much personal information about her therapy clients to the students in her class.”

👎 Helpfulness

25/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • kept me interested
  • entertaining instructor
  • To learn to material, you would !

Theme 2

📈

  • and up front

Theme 3

⚠️ About Professionalism

  • gives out too much personal information about her therapy clients
  • !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

6 in-person reviews over several years show a and criticism with moderate detail.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH1253 reviews
COUN0621 review
PSYC1251 review
PSYCHOLOGY1251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values