AI Rate Professor

Geology

Chris Johnson

GEO111 · GEO110 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are a geology major ready for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWould not recommendHard testsDoes not know how to teachToo intenseHeavy short-term workload
  • Both reviews rate quality 2 and advise against taking him.
  • an unnecessary attitude.
  • Workload feels crushing for a junior-college credit class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, so an A demands heavy study with little safety net.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students , and too much work in little time.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; one student attended regularly with still-poor results.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Both and difficulty.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Hard, overly difficult tests with no mention of curves or signal strict grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

He forces a lot of work in a short amount of time, which students call too intense.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students say teaching is not his calling and he does not know how to teach.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Complaints center on .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

as intense, poorly taught, and stacked with .

Main concern

Harsh tests and weak teaching for non-majors seeking basic credits.

What students said

“ .”
GEO111
“Good personality but does not know how to teach!!!”
GEO110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as far more difficult than necessary with no student-friendly formats mentioned.

Hard TestsHigh DifficultyIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and central to the negative experience.

Hard TestsHigh Difficulty
“the to be.”
GEO111
“Way too intense, forces a lot of work in a short amount of time.”
GEO110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 , and strong avoid advice. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

12/100

“ .”

📉 Poor Teaching

22/100

“Good personality but does not know how to teach!!!”

📝 Brutal Tests

28/100

“the to be.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • It's pretty obvious that teaching is not his calling.
  • Good personality but does not know how to teach!!!
  • Can show an unecessary attitude at times.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Workload

  • the to be.
  • Way too intense, forces a lot of work in a short amount of time.
  • Great if your a Geology major, not so much if you are trying to get credits

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Two consistent 2012 negative reviews agree on hard teaching and exams, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GEO1101 review
GEO1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values