AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Shanna Holladay

PSY125 · PSYCH125 · PSYCH120 · PSYC120 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you study the review and book carefully, but expect .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny storytellerTeaches by the bookTest review helpfulBest-answer examsExtra credit available
  • Engaging personality with jokes and real-work examples
  • Tells students exactly what chapters and topics to study
  • tricky

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and , but best-possible-answer tests require careful study rather than an automatic A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Material is textbook-driven and approachable with review, yet tests feel challenging for some students.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews , but missing review sessions is warned against for test success.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

, and , though a few criticize test clarity and class cancellations.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

She can award points through logical debate and offers , but .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Textbook-based teaching and complaints.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Students like her humor and real examples, though some say she goes off topic or .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments center on tests, reviews for exams, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and funny with clear study guidance, but and occasional cancellations.

Main concern

and uneven teaching clarity can hurt grades despite a fun class vibe.

What students said

“Definitely teaches by the book and lets you know what's going to be on the !).”
PSYC120
“ but fair.”
PSYCH125
“ , which made the tests difficult.”
PSYCH125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are textbook-aligned with review support but use a .

Challenging but fair testsBest possible answer formatReview sessions matter

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as challenging yet fair, with and helpful review sessions.

Best possible answerChallenging fair testsDo not miss the review
“ but fair.”
PSYCH125
“lets you know what's going to be on the !).”
PSYC120
“SHE DOES NOT GIVE VERY CLEAR INFO ON THE TRUE”
PSY125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fun teacher! Loves to talk to the class and joke but often goes off topic. Definitely teaches by the book and lets you know what's going to be on the !).”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and mixed clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Style

68/100

“She tells you what you should study and she tells you what chapters. and very nice!”

📝

48/100

“ , which made the tests difficult.”

👍 Recommendation

66/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Fun teacher! Loves to talk to the class and joke
  • using real examples from her work experience
  • and very nice

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but fair
  • opportunities throughout the semester

Theme 3

⚠️ About Consistency

  • Teacher often cancels class
  • often goes off topic
  • doesn't have the teaching knowledge

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six in-person reviews from 2009-2011 show mixed but detailed views; sample size is modest and all comments are older.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH1253 reviews
PSY1251 review
PSYC1201 review
PSYCH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values