AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Casey Davis

MATH106 · MATH121 · MATH222 · MATH90 · MATH94 · CALC121 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already master the material and want a hard-driving pure lecture style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMonotone lecturesTests harder than homeworkSkips stepsLoses strong math studentsAvoid for lower levels
  • Most students call lectures boring and
  • problems
  • Even strong math students report dropping or feeling lost

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

and strong students still drop, so an A demands exceptional self-study.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Lecture pace and skipped steps make content feel much harder than expected for precalculus and calculus.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students say only one strong positive outlier.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

and intensify them, so grading feels unforgiving.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students describe intense practice needs and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Many call him smart but monotone, unable to meet student level, and ineffective at building understanding.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Comments focus on extremely hard tests and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and brutal tests leave even prepared students lost, with one positive higher-math outlier.

Main concern

and skipped steps make success feel unattainable for typical students.

What students said

“ than the hardest problems from the book.”
MATH106
“I got an A+ in Calc 1 and I love math but I was completely lost in his class.”
MATH121
“He make sure for the class to understand by stopping and ask if we have questions”
MATH222

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are consistently described as much harder than .

Insanely difficult testsHarder than book problemsHard skills quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and tougher than the hardest book problems.

Insanely difficult testsHarder than homeworkHard skills quizzes
“ than the hardest problems from the book.”
MATH106
“ on h.w and then made more intense.”
MATH94
“ because I had no idea what was going on.. .”
CALC121

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This guy needs to realize that he is teaching a pre calculus class filled with people who may not good at math. He expects you to understand everything from his boring, monotone lecture! ”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“SNOOZER! This poor guy is such a bad teacher.”

📉

22/100

“ than the hardest problems from the book.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • boring, monotone lecture
  • doesnt stop talking in his monotone voice
  • he needs to understand that everyone in

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I was completely lost in his class

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • This teacher is nice person and clearly understands the material
  • His Character and Willingness to teach are good

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight consistent mostly negative in-person reviews from 2010-2011 give a , though all are older and lack grade data.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 56
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CALC1212 reviews
MATH1212 reviews
MATH1061 review
MATH2221 review
MATH901 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values