AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Loi Vo-Nguyen

ALGEB94 · MATHMATH · MATHVAR · MATH108 · MATH10 · MATH100 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Skip unless you already know the math well enough to compensate for .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandAccent barrierUnclear explanationsWeekly quizzesMixed reviews
  • Most students struggle with clarity and accent-related comprehension.
  • Course difficulty is often rated high despite one glowing easy review.
  • , and a one-page notes sheet on tests.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

High difficulty ratings and frustration about unclear work outweigh the single easy positive review.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Average difficulty is high and comments emphasize confusion rather than light content.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most quality ratings and comments are negative, with only one strong endorsement.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

One review notes a notes sheet and review packet, but overall tone .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly quizzes, group classwork, and load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Clarity and accent issues dominate; organization is noted once but does not offset comprehension problems.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly quizzes, group classwork, and mixed assessment mix.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and accent, with one student calling her the best math professor and another noting organization plus weekly quizzes.

Main concern

Communication barriers make lectures and .

What students said

“She was soooo hard to understand and never was very clear on explaining the work or the assignments.”
MATH108
“ !”
ALGEB94
“ .”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and review packet, not full open book, with weekly quizzes in between.

One-page notes sheetReview packetWeekly quizzesNo open book

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

plus a review packet; not open book, with weekly quizzes.

One-page notes sheetReview packetWeekly quizzes
“She lets us use 1pg of notes 1 sided for the tests and gives us a review packet. No open book/notes - just the cheat sheet.”
MATHMATH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was soooo hard to understand and never was very clear on explaining the work or the assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, emphasizing comprehension issues and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🗣️ Clarity Barrier

25/100

“She was soooo hard to understand and never was very clear on explaining the work or the assignments.”

📉 Overall Quality

32/100

“ !”

📝

55/100

“She lets us use 1pg of notes 1 sided for the tests and gives us a review packet.”

⭐ Minority Praise

90/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hard to understand sometimes.
  • but has a strong accent.
  • never was very clear on explaining the work or the assignments

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • previous week
  • No open book/notes - just the cheat sheet
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only six mostly older reviews exist; the but sample size and detail depth are limited.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ALGEB941 review
MATH101 review
MATH1001 review
MATH1081 review
MATHMATH1 review
Show 1 more courses
MATHVAR1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values