AI Rate Professor

English

Cameron Young

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG11 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1B · 156 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.21%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will read, write carefully, and ; avoid if you need an easy A or fear AI accusations.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHeavy ReadingEssay HeavyAI ScrutinyStrong Feedback
  • Expect heavy weekly .
  • and , but AI authenticity flags can force rewrites or harsh penalties.
  • growth, not an easy English credit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A , and surviving a tough grader plus frequent AI scrutiny.

Online reviews stress AI flags and essay rewrites more; in-person reviews stress participation and reading depth.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content is dense English theory with weekly reading and .

; accelerated online terms feel especially stacked.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

and participation is repeatedly treated as essential to succeed.

In-person reviews emphasize speaking and discussion more; and flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Most students would take him again for growth and support, but a vocal minority and AI paranoia.

Recommendation is strong when students want challenge; weaker among those seeking an easy online credit.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

65%, and AI suspicions can force rewrites or fails.

Format shift

Online reviews report more .

Workload

Heavy

26/100

the load consistently time-consuming.

Format shift

Short online terms amplify the same heavy essay and reading load.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Students often call lectures creative and , though and AI handling undercut trust.

Format shift

; online students highlight Canvas organization and email access.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and written work rather than traditional exams alone.

Format shift

Both formats center essays; some sections also mention a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and deep philosophical readings with engaging lectures; workload and tough grading remain high.

Main concern

Excessive reading and seeking a light English class.

What students said

“Very interesting lectures. Kept me engaged, and has a good way of getting complex philosophical concepts across.”
ENG1B
“The workload is excessive. and a .”
ENG1B
“if . if you are here just for credits, get ready to read.”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online , and essays; feedback and accessibility are often praised, but tough grading and AI checks frustrate some students.

Main concern

AI accusations and feel they wrote original work.

What students said

“He is also notorious for accusing students of using AI even when 0% is detected.”
ENG1B
“This professor accuses students of cheating and using AI in the ”
ENG1A
“Professor Young is very detailed in better writer.”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay- and writing-centered with occasional written midterms; friendliness and AI scrutiny.

Written MidtermEssay-Based AssessmentAI Authenticity ChecksExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and sometimes a written midterm with little mention of proctoring software.

Written MidtermEssaysWeekly LabsParticipation
“ and a .”
ENG1B
“there was 3 essay, all straight forward. .”
ENG1B

Online

Online , and drafts with strong anti-AI enforcement and .

Essay HeavyAI ChecksLabsExtra Credit
“Grade is and rough drafts. Don't use AI”
ENG1B
“He is also notorious for accusing students of using AI even when 0% is detected.”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you're looking for an . If you're in it .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and in-person English , and teaching quality. Credibility rating: High.

📚

26/100

“There is a TON of , but that's to be expected when taking an English course in college.”

🧠 Tough But Growth-Oriented

66/100

“If you're looking for an . If you're in it .”

⚠️ AI Accusations Risk

30/100

“He is also notorious for accusing students of using AI even when 0% is detected.”

💬

72/100

“Professor Young is very detailed in better writer.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very interesting lectures. Kept me engaged
  • his slides are uniquely designed, and
  • He gives us material and breaks it down so that you have to think

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Each essay had an average of around 65%
  • The workload is excessive

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Character

  • he genuinely seems to care and will make the time to help you
  • Had family issues come up often and the professor worked with me every time
  • Professor Young is an outstanding educator known for his patience and kindness

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

156

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent detailed reviews across online and in-person formats show consistent , and teaching quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 551
4 out of 549
3 out of 515
2 out of 516
1 out of 526

Course coverage

ENG1B42 reviews
ENG1A3 reviews
ENGL1A3 reviews
ENG111 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 3 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

13

C+ 3 · C 9 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

15

Not sure yet 15