AI Rate Professor

Physics

Bilkis Babli

PHY4C · PHY4B · PHY2A · PHYSICS4A · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if you have another physics option; if you can teach yourself the material and grind problem sets.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRushed lecturesSelf-teach requiredLots of homeworkHard testsKind person weak lecturer
  • Most students say lectures are rushed or confusing and that real learning happens on YouTube or alone.
  • and exams are hard with low class averages, though .
  • A few recent students still passed with As when they self-studied; overall take-again rate is about 20%.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some As , but and heavy homework make an easy A unrealistic.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Physics content plus rushed lectures and .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

58/100

/mandatory-not-required notes, though some sections still list Yes.

In-person only; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Only about 20% would take her again and most detailed reviews urge choosing any other physics professor.

and consistently weak aside from two recent positive notes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Harsh tests and , and some forgiveness on a hard subject.

Format shift

In-person only; grading help appears mainly as .

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Weekly homework can run many pages, labs add work, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is that she is a and often rushes or errs on the board.

Format shift

In-person only; a couple recent reviews are milder but still note rushed lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Substantial homework and labs plus hard quizzes/exams; .

Format shift

some courses according to students.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person physics students mostly report rushed messy lectures, heavy homework, hard exams, and the and allows corrections.

Main concern

Lectures often fail to build concepts, so students pay tuition then learn from outside sources while .

What students said

“Hands down, this is THE . She does not know how to teach others”
PHY-4B
“Good person but a bad teacher... I learned most of my stuff from YouTube. Tests are hard, class avg 40-50%.”
PHYSICS-4A
“Her lectures are very rushed, but if you manage to keep up, you'll learn... she allows for and a bit of .”
PHY-4C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently hard with low averages; friendliness comes mainly from curves or .

Hard examsLow class averagesCurvesTest correctionsSome online quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

/exams, study-guide overlap, and sometimes corrections or curves.

Hard examsClass avg 40-50%Test correctionsOnline exams/quizzesCurves
“Tests are hard, class avg 40-50%. Some questions from study guide.”
PHYSICS-4A
“Her tests are moderately difficulty, but if you study, you'll pass with an A because she allows for and a bit of .”
PHY-4C
“The exams and .”
PHYSICS-4A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews (0 online), highlighting lecture quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She does not know how to teach at all. You won't learn a single thing from her.”

📚

25/100

“I learned most of my stuff from YouTube.”

❤️ Character vs Skill

45/100

“Good person but a bad teacher.”

👍 Rare Positive Path

50/100

“she allows for and a bit of . Homework and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are sloppy and rushed
  • just did example problems
  • pulls equations out of nowhere

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tests are hard, class avg 40-50%
  • assigns too many hw every week
  • but curved

Theme 3

⚠️ Student Warnings

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

; themes are consistent but sample size and recent mild positives keep credibility medium.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PHYSICS-4A5 reviews
PHY-4B2 reviews
354021 review
PHY-2A1 review
PHY-4C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1