AI Rate Professor

History

Lori Pelgone

HIS2 · HIS7 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
38.89%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Avoid unless no better history option; expect and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderAI/plagiarism flagsHard to reachExtra credit lifelineLecture heavy history
  • and communication slow or unhelpful.
  • Repeated plagiarism/AI accusation stories damage trust even when content is manageable.
  • A minority praise passionate lectures and that can save a grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Content can be light, but tough rubrics, zeros for flags, and .

Online ; some in-person students still landed As with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Survey history reading is manageable, but volume of , and .

Both formats call material learnable; online stress is more about process than concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

while many online courses do not require live presence.

; in person more often mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and many urge picking any other history professor.

; in-person recommendations are mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough-grader tags, 75-as-mastered scales, and plagiarism zeros define the .

Format shift

Harshness appears in both formats, especially online AI flags.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly discussions, quizzes, readings, and .

Format shift

Online weekly post cadence is the main workload pattern.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Passion for history shows for some, but confusion, boring lectures, and weak support dominate.

Format shift

In-person lectures get more praise; online teaching experience is weaker.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of quizzes, discussions, papers, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews mention short quizzes and essays; in person adds discussion-heavy weeks.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some enjoy passionate lectures and creative , others still report plagiarism zeros and poor communication.

Main concern

Inconsistent clarity and occasional plagiarism penalties still hurt trust.

What students said

“Even though I hate history; her class was an enjoyable experience.”
HIS-7
“she even offered a free A for if we beat her in a card game.”
HIS-7
“she marked me for plagerism when I did not plagerize and it resulted in a 0 for a essay.”
HIS-7

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

tough , and hard-to-reach communication, with a few saying the work itself is doable.

Main concern

chance to appeal.

What students said

“I was falsely accused of plagiarism and denied the chance to provide evidence.”
HIS-2
“she grades so hard 75/100 is considered mastered and 100 is exceeds”
HIS-7
“get ready to be miserable”
HIS-7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Finals and quizzes are often short multiple choice; .

Multiple choice finalWeekly quizzesExtra creditPapers

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as doable, with one creative free-A card-game offer and .

Doable finalExtra creditCreative final incentive
“she even offered a free A for if we beat her in a card game. No one in our class beat her but .”
HIS-7

Online

Online comments describe manageable multiple-choice finals and .

Multiple choice finalWeekly quizzes
“The final wasn't long there were 25 questions multiple choice.”
HIS-7
“weekly was usually a 2 , and sometimes a essay.”
HIS-7

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . If you have to pick a different professor, she grades so hard”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews with heavy online weighting. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Recommendation Level

34/100

“ .”

⚖️

22/100

“she grades so hard 75/100 is considered mastered and 100 is exceeds”

🚨 Integrity Accusations

20/100

“I was falsely accused of plagiarism and denied the chance to provide evidence.”

📚 Content Manageable

55/100

“This class was unbelievably easy. There are only 2 assignments a ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures can be long but
  • lectures are and monotonous
  • and answers questions without hesitation

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • get ready to be miserable
  • Although she does offer , she needs to or else everyone would be fail
  • I ended with an A despite all that because of the

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • Hard to communicate with;
  • if for a response
  • Not easy to get ahold of or work with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen recent reviews with and communication issues across mostly online classes.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

HIS-715 reviews
HIS-23 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 3

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values