AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Noel Alvarado

MAT12 · MATHMATH · MATH35 · STATS1 · MAT35 · MATH1235290 · MATH12 · MAT3535520 · MATH63 · MATH52 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong in math and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest heavy statsLots of homeworkParanoid cheating enforcementHonorlock privacy issuesPolarizing math instructor
  • Recent , and harsh exams.
  • Workload is heavy with and pop quizzes; .
  • Older reviews sometimes praise energy and , but if possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

22/100

Many say As are rare, half classes fail or drop, and .

Both formats show low A access; online .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Stats and intermediate math move fast with and .

Difficulty complaints dominate in person and online.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple reviews say two absences can get you dropped and skipping wrecks your chance.

Attendance strictness is mainly documented for in-person sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and recent students repeatedly say wait for another professor.

Online reviews are uniformly negative; in person is mixed but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and points lost for method/boxing answers.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

, and long lecture videos create a crushing weekly load.

Format shift

Online MATH63 describes 20+ hour weeks; in person also reports lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some find him energetic and stepwise, but many call him rude, off-topic, paranoid, or too fast.

Format shift

Older in-person praise exists; recent in-person and online teaching reviews are poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Quizzes, midterms, and cumulative finals dominate; but .

Format shift

mentioned online and for some remote tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some older students call him funny and clear, while many recent reviews , and failing grades.

Main concern

and accusations of .

What students said

“More than half of my class dropped out and he accused me of cheating multiple times”
MAT12
“In total, he accused around 10+ people for cheating with no evidence. He also requires you to install an ”
MATH63
“Professor Alvarado is a great teacher! I took math25 with him and he really slowed it down for us”
MATHMATH

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

invasive proctoring and .

Main concern

Proctored .

What students said

“ record you and your audio and makes you scan your area before starting the test”
MAT12
“The homework is overwhelming with 10 sections of 30+ problems each. Expect to spend 20+ hours a week just to understand the material.”
MATH63

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

room scans, and pop quizzes add pressure.

HonorlockRoom scan proctoringPop quizzesCumulative finalTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person testing is strict and and frequent pop quizzes.

Honorlock extensionPop quizzesStrict grading methodsCumulative final
“He also requires you to install an .”
MATH63
“Forces us to use a and do a 360 of .”
STATS1
“ .”
MAT12

Online

and requires scanning the room.

Proctored recordingRoom scanHarsh exams
“ record you and your audio and makes you scan your area before starting the as tho that's an invasion of my privacy.”
MAT12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THIS IS THE IF YOU WANT TO PASS.”

Voice snapshots generated from 47 reviews with strong recent negative clustering. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Rate

30/100

“If this is the class because he fails everyone.”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

16/100

“Expect to spend 20+ hours a week just to understand the material.”

🕵️ Cheating Paranoia

20/100

“he accused around 10+ people for cheating with no evidence.”

⚡

55/100

“He teaches very well, breaking down lectures into step by step instructions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he really slowed it down for us and made
  • Hes a super cool funny teacher but he gets off topic alot
  • Mean! Not helpfull or patient.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Half the class dropped and 1/3 of the remaining failed
  • lots and lots of
  • he goes very fast in a semester course 3-4 chapters a day

Theme 3

🔒

  • scan your area before starting the test
  • Beware of pop quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

47

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-seven reviews over many years provide a large, detailed sample with consistent modern complaints about difficulty and enforcement.

Inside 47 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 56
3 out of 510
2 out of 54
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MAT1220 reviews
MAT358 reviews
MATH354 reviews
MATH634 reviews
MATH523 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATHMATH3 reviews
STATS12 reviews
MAT35355201 review
MATH121 review
MATH12352901 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

9

B+ 1 · B 8

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1