AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Maria Adams

EAR33 · EAR20 · EAR40 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
27/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

; only consider in person if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes Not Grade On TimeIgnores EmailsOnline Avoid FlagCaring In Person ContrastLast-Minute Grade Dumps
  • Online EAR sections repeatedly report no grading until term end, ignored emails, and dumped work.
  • A and doable, but the dominant online pattern is unprofessional.
  • Content can be easy, yet chaos and delayed grades destroy the experience for most reviewers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and some still finish with As, but and errors make outcomes unpredictable.

Online reports both easy work and grade disasters; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Material is mostly discussions, readings, and .

Both formats call content manageable; online chaos is about delivery, not content depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

; in-person is mixed with little detail.

Online evidence drives flexibility; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Take-again rate is about 31%, with .

Online is strongly avoid; the again.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Some call her forgiving, but , and opaque late-term grades.

Format shift

Leniency claims appear online and in person; online also includes harsh grade-outcome complaints.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Discussions and projects are often easy, but irregular dumps of multi-week work create sudden spikes.

Format shift

Online has the dump-and-delay pattern; .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is no teaching presence online; in-person stories and care are better but outnumbered.

Format shift

Online teaching quality is poor; .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Discussions, quizzes, papers, observations, and a .

Format shift

Online mentions discussions, quizzes, papers, and finals; in-person adds observations and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Small in-person sample is mostly positive on care and lectures, with .

Main concern

Even in person, delayed feedback on major observations is a reported issue.

What students said

“Professor Adams is a caring and with assignments.”
EAR20
“She hasn't graded any observations which is a big part of our grade or ”
EAR20

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online EAR is widely described as and irregular assignment posting.

Main concern

She often does not grade, answer emails, or post work on a predictable schedule.

What students said

“ . Very unprofessional many people end up dropping her class.”
EAR20
“she hasn't graded anything, and we've only done half the .”
EAR33
“She never read them. . ... .”
ear40

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some classes have quizzes and a ; reviews do not prove webcam or Lockdown proctoring.

DiscussionsQuizzesFinal ProjectDelayed GradingTextbook Dependent Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention occasional quizzes and chapter .

Occasional QuizzesChapter QuestionsObservations
“Occasional quizzes and .”
EAR20

Online

Online work includes discussions, quizzes, papers, and a the term.

DiscussionsQuizzesFinal ProjectNo Clear Proctoring Details
“No tests :) Big project for the final with 2 weeks to do it.”
EAR33
“She has a lot of , and quizzes.”
EAR20
“ and studying the whole chapter.”
EAR20

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Very unprofessional many people end up dropping her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (10 online, 3 in person), highlighting . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She does not teach what so ever.”

📧 Communication Failure

15/100

“If ”

⏱️

20/100

“she never grades ANYTHING til last minute”

❤️ In-Person Contrast

70/100

“Professor Adams is a caring and with assignments.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Online Chaos

  • she hasn't graded anything
  • She'll go 2 weeks without posting assignments then dump 3 weeks worth
  • She was checked out all semester.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This was a easy class.
  • - and yet my transcript says D.

Theme 3

🏫

  • Her lectures are engaging, especially her stories.
  • nothing to complain about but the observations she never really went into full detail
  • Prints the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

13 reviews with highly consistent online non-grading complaints, offset by a .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

EAR209 reviews
EAR332 reviews
EAR-401 review
ear401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4