AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ahmad Walid

MATH1A · MAT25 · MAT12 · MATH35 · MAT35 · MATH65 · MAT1A · MAT52 · 1A · MAT65 · MAT36096 · MAT36101 · MATH52 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
97.62%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

if you will attend and use his study guides; he is widely seen as the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesStudy guides match examsExtra creditHilariousCaring
  • Near-unanimous praise as a top math professor who makes calculus understandable.
  • Exams closely match study guides, with , and .
  • Attendance and , but students say fair effort yields strong grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

, and group quizzes make As common when students show up and practice.

Both formats report easy exams; most detailed A-path evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Calculus and algebra stay real math, but students say he slows down and .

In-person reviews dominate; online still calls the material manageable with lectures available.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping hurts understanding and grades.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Nearly all students say take him, with and about 98% would-take-again.

Strong recommendation holds online and in person, with denser praise in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Students say he is not a , and offers and group quizzes.

Format shift

Leniency appears in both formats; .

Workload

Light

68/100

and can feel repetitive, but many call the overall load manageable with generous time.

Format shift

One older online review called HW minimal; in person mentions more practice work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

dominate across decades of reviews.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is richest; online is mostly positive with one weaker COVID review.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and exams closely tied to study guides and notes.

Format shift

Both formats mention quizzes and exams; study-guide alignment is clearest in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and supportive with easy-to-prep exams.

Main concern

and ; a rare critic felt unprepared for the next course.

What students said

“Quite possibly the .”
MAT1A
“ study guide.”
MAT1A
“If you focus during lectures, earning an A+ is easy.”
MAT1A

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are mostly positive with and , though one COVID-era review called lectures less helpful for independent learners.

Main concern

and less helpful lectures for some independent students.

What students said

“Prof. Ahmad is passionate about his work he does his best to help you learn, his lectures are beautiful.”
MAT1A
“super easy minimal hw group quizzes MC tests prof hard ”
MAT25
“Made calculus easy to understand and always made extra time to help students who were having trouble.”
MATH1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are widely described as clear and very close to study guides, with supportive policies.

Study guide mirrors examNotecard allowedLowest test droppedGroup quizzesExtra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams closely match study guides, often allow notecards, and .

Study guide mirrors examNotecard for examsLowest test droppedGroup quizzes
“ study guide.”
MAT1A
“Group quizzes, and notecard for exams.”
MAT1A
“ .”
MAT1A

Online

Online reviews mention multiple-choice tests and but .

Multiple-choice testsClear gradingExtra credit
“super ”
MAT25
“He .”
MAT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Quite possibly the . He has a passion for teaching that I have not seen in other math professors.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews across online and and . Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Best math professor i've ever had! His accent didn't affect my understandment of the aterial at all becuase he really but why the answer is what it is.”

📝

86/100

“ study guide.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“ . 10/10”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The GOAT. The and greatest.
  • He makes , and knows how to make students engaged.
  • Slow lectures, if you like that. if you ask questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • guides he gives.
  • If you focus during lectures, earning an A+ is easy.
  • I had failed this class twice and this time I pass with an A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Most down to Earth professor I've ever had.
  • He is so sweet and hilarious, class flew by!
  • He truly wants to see his students do well in his class!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-two reviews span many years and courses with highly consistent praise and and .

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MAT1A18 reviews
1A4 reviews
MAT360964 reviews
MAT361013 reviews
MAT122 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH1A2 reviews
MATH522 reviews
MATH652 reviews
MAT251 review
MAT351 review
MAT521 review
MAT651 review
MATH351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

37 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 6 · A 23

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3