AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Salena Wakim

ANT1 · ANT37029 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless and chase every quiz detail yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTextbook DependentTest HeavyInaccessibleDisengaging LecturesRead-to-Survive
  • Quizzes and or slides.
  • Several students call her inaccessible, harsh, or stressful in class.
  • One recent positive outlier says the workload is easy and lectures are strong.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

As appear, but high grades require heavy textbook memorization rather than lecture learning.

; online gives little grade clarity.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content is manageable if you read constantly, but lectures add little clarity.

Both formats stress reading; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and others optional, with participation still mattering.

; others list yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Only one clear would-take-again yes among five reviews, with accessibility and .

The single strong recommendation is in person; online reviews are negative or noncommittal.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Graded by few items in one review, but and grades feel opaque.

Format shift

events; online says she does not update progress.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reading and quizzes dominate; one student found it easy while .

Format shift

Online is textbook-quiz focused; and event-based .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Common themes are disengaging or mismatched lectures, harsh tone, and weak communication.

Format shift

One in-person 5-star outlier conflicts with broader poor ratings online and older in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes and more than active lecture learning.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize reading-based quizzes; online also labeled test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one easy-A praise versus harsh classroom tone and .

Main concern

Lectures and ; classroom climate can feel stressful.

What students said

“Can be harsh or even disrespectful towards students especially if the class is silent.”
ANT1
“the you have to practically memorize the book”
ANT37029

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe , and weak lecture-to-test alignment.

Main concern

Hard to get help and .

What students said

“One of the .”
ANT1
“She posts lecture slideshows but barely covers anything related to the quizzes.”
ANT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes reward book memorization more than lecture slides, with .

Textbook QuizzesTest HeavyLecture Slides Mismatch

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; slides reviewed in class reportedly do not match tests.

Book MemorizationTest Heavy
“you have to practically memorize the book if u with to get an A ”
ANT37029

Online

Online quizzes track textbook and videos more than slideshow lectures; .

Textbook QuizzesSlideshow Lectures
“Class is also very textbook-dependent as most of the .”
ANT1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“the you have to practically memorize the book if u with to get an A ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (2 online, 3 in and access problems. Credibility rating: Low.

📖 Textbook Over Lectures

42/100

“All the .”

📵 Accessibility Issues

30/100

“One of the .”

👎 Low Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the lectures were really disengaging and she was overall pretty frenetic
  • Very good professor with easy work load, very manageable

Theme 2

📈

  • Get ready to read
  • Test heavy
  • book

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews with mixed detail and one strong outlier reduce confidence despite recent dates.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANT14 reviews
ANT370291 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1