AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Joseph DeGuzman

MAT12 · MATH35 · MAT35 · MAT52 · MAT10 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if you will use study guides, office hours, and ; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFast LecturesExtra CreditStudy Guide ExamsLots of HomeworkPass If You Try
  • and are often multiple choice, with frequent .
  • Many students pass if they keep trying, but lectures are often too fast to follow alone.
  • and limited instructor help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

and , but an A still needs consistent work and outside help for many.

In-person students stress pass-if-you-try; online reports include both A and C outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Math content stays challenging even when assessment is predictable and support exists.

Online can feel easier once remote; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

and sometimes not; participation and on-time work matter more than pure seat time.

Mixed flags across in-person and online; several in-person say mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; fans love support and fair tests, critics dislike rushed teaching.

Stronger recommendations in person; online comments are cooler or empty.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

, and study-guide alignment make passing realistic for students who persist.

Format shift

In-person repeatedly cites EC and pass-if-try; online .

Workload

Moderate

40/100

Lots of homework and platform work, offset somewhat by predictable tests and .

Format shift

Both formats tag lots of homework; online piles end-of-term platform work.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Helpful and willing in office hours for many, but live lectures are often too fast and hard to understand.

Format shift

; online students often self-teach.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

, but multiple-choice tests matching study guides are the central grade lever.

Format shift

and group quizzes; online is homework-platform heavy with test-heavy tags.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and exact study-guide tests versus frustration with rushed, hard-to-follow lectures.

Main concern

Lecture pace can leave students lost without tutoring or office hours.

What students said

“You are tested on exactly the study guide. 10/10”
MAT10
“His lectures go wayy to fast. You could barely understand him.”
MATH35

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report , and that outside videos or YouTube teach more than he does.

Main concern

Expensive required software and minimal useful instructor support.

What students said

“YouTube taught me stats.”
MAT12
“if ”
MAT35

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

choice and flexible quiz formats, lowering surprise risk.

Study Guide Matches ExamMultiple ChoiceGroup QuizzesTake-Home QuizzesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are multiple choice and match the study guide; .

Study Guide ExamsMultiple ChoiceGroup QuizzesTake-Home Quizzes
“Make sure you do the study guide because that is exactly what you are tested on.”
MAT35
“ in groups.”
MAT35

Online

Online comments say little about proctoring; .

Platform HomeworkSelf-Paced Assignments
“all of it was due at the end of the term. I liked this because I got to work at my own pace”
MAT12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You are tested on exactly the study guide. 10/10”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews (3 online, 11 in , and effort-based passing. Credibility rating: Medium.

📋

74/100

“ and exactly like the study guide.”

⚡ Fast Lecture Pain

58/100

“Mr. DeGuzman lectures very fast and .”

🛟 Pass If You Persist

68/100

“He only fails when you quit trying”

🤝 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He rushed through many of his lectures however, he was always willing to go over these again in office hours
  • He's funny, but if you're good at math
  • He is often rude, sarcastic, and is difficult to talk to

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Support

  • As long as you try he will pass you
  • No surprises nor curveball

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • YouTube taught me stats
  • if
  • this class was pretty easy once we switched to online

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

14 reviews over several years with recurring study-guide and pace themes support medium-high confidence.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MAT357 reviews
MAT103 reviews
MATH352 reviews
MAT121 review
MAT521 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values