AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Elizabeth Walker

POL30898 · POLSC1000 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid if ; only take her if you need an easy grade and and homework.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisorganizedLots of ReadingExtra Credit HeavyUnclear InstructionsEasy Grader if You Submit
  • Teaching and organization draw frequent complaints: , and limited involvement.
  • Doing the work still yields easy full credit and lots of for many students.
  • Online short terms can feel overloaded with reading, reflections, and group work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Multiple students say submitting work and using yields full credit and easy As despite weak teaching.

; online short terms still demand volume of work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not conceptually hard, but and .

In person can feel easier content-wise; online volume makes it feel harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and some not required.

Online is often optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and repeated complaints about organization, attitude, and workload outweigh a few positive notes.

Most negativity is online; in person also criticizes organization and tone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

78/100

Students say she accepts almost anything for full credit and offers substantial .

Format shift

In person and online both note easy full credit; one online student .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and occasional group projects pile up, especially in short terms.

Format shift

Online winter or summer loads are the heaviest; in person still has lots of work.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Common themes , and a rude or detached tone.

Format shift

One online student had a great experience; the rest lean negative in both formats.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and more than high-stakes polished exams.

Format shift

Online emphasizes module readings and assignments; in person still accepts almost any submission.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Limited in-person comments describe disorganized lectures and assignments but .

Main concern

Rude tone and .

What students said

“Rude and thinks poorly of others. Lectures and , but she pretty much accepted anything for full credit”
POLSC1000
“she's an . Yes theres lots of work BUT you don't even need to try that hard & you'll still get full credit”
POL30898

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online is reading-heavy Canvas modules with lots of , and uneven instructor clarity.

Main concern

Dry long readings, unclear assignments, and harsh or and reflections.

What students said

“ . They are super long and dry”
POL30898
“The amount of work is insane for a short semester”
POL30898
“i have no idea why she had bad reviews! she was such a great teacher”
POL30898

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews stress assignment volume and more than formal proctored exams.

Extra CreditLots of HomeworkReflectionsGroup ProjectModule Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person comments focus on disorganized assignments accepted for full .

Full Credit for Submitted WorkExtra CreditLots of Homework
“she pretty much accepted anything for full credit”
POLSC1000
“you don't even need to try that hard & you'll still get full credit”
POL30898

Online

Online assessment is module reading, quizzes, reflections, and .

Module QuizzesReflectionsExtra CreditGroup Project
“The only saving grace was there is a lot of ”
POL30898
“ talking about her assignments”
POL30898

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Rude and thinks poorly of others. Lectures and , but she pretty much accepted anything for full credit.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, mostly online, emphasizing organization, workload, and easy-credit patterns. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Lectures and ”

🎁 Easy Credit Path

76/100

“she's an ... you'll still get full credit”

📖 Reading Overload

24/100

“ . They are super long and dry”

👎 Low Recommendation

28/100

“ unless you enjoy writing a lot”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Organization and Tone

  • Rude and thinks poorly of others
  • Some of
  • she replied there is, with an attitude

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Do the work and you'll pass regardless
  • there is a lot of
  • The amount of work is insane for a short semester

Theme 3

💬 Split Student Reactions

  • she was such a great teacher and the
  • I wish she'd been more involved in the course
  • Read the assigned chapters, be aware of deadlines, and it's smooth sailing

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only eight reviews with mixed intensity reduce certainty, but organization and easy-credit themes repeat enough to trust the direction.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

POL308987 reviews
POLSC10001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1