AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Lynne Vazquez

EAR26 · EAR20 · EAR19 · EAR24 · EAR34 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
65%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her only if and ; otherwise pick a more consistent instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of homeworkCaring when organizedDisorganized gradingWeekly projectsAttendance matters
  • Many students still get As if they stay on top of weekly work
  • caring and , and cancelations for others
  • Project and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many reported A or A+ grades with steady weekly work, even when quality ratings were low.

Both online and in person show high A rates; effort still required for projects and papers.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is often called straightforward, but and .

Online EAR20/EAR26 often feel easier; EAR34 projects raise difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

; some online sections are more flexible.

In person leans mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and humor; others warn about organization and attitude.

Older and some online reviews are warmer; recent in-person and EAR34 online are harsher.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

High A rates exist, but tough-grader and .

Format shift

Online EAR34 tough-grader tags contrast with easy A comments in other online courses.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly projects, discussion boards, papers, and materials shopping create a heavy steady load.

Format shift

Online EAR34 is especially project-heavy; .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and reports of rudeness, cancelations, and confusion.

Format shift

In-person cancelation and rudeness complaints are stronger recently; online quality swings hard.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Weekly projects, papers, lesson plans, and .

Format shift

Both formats are assignment-heavy; some courses add quizzes and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

fans love her humor and help, critics cite cancelations, rudeness, and .

Main concern

, and inconsistent clarity on assignments.

What students said

“ . Lynne! I .”
EAR24
“Cancelled class at least once a week... She is rude for no reason.”
EAR24
“I found her to be very disorganized and ”
EAR34

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ranges from easy organized modules and easy As , and material costs.

Main concern

, and picky expectations on handmade activities.

What students said

“A project every week that requires you to buy materials... She .”
EAR34
“Just stay on track and its an easy A.”
EAR20
“The assignments and if you READ the instructions!!”
EAR26

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly projects and papers with some quizzes and a .

QuizzesMultiple choice finalProject-heavy assessmentPapers

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize weekly curriculum work, group projects, and .

Weekly curriculum projectsGroup projectsTests mentioned
“She does have a lot of hw and online assignments, and you do have to be on it!”
EAR34
“You will have four main assignments on the four main observation methods.”
EAR19

Online

Online work centers on discussion boards, quizzes, short essays or projects, and sometimes a ; .

Discussion boardsQuizzesShort essaysProjects
“A few quizzes and 2 or 3 short .”
EAR20
“Class(online) consists of multiple discussion boards, 6 quizzes... and 4 core assignment”
EAR26

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Lynne! I ... You will have to work hard, but she makes you want to put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting the care-vs-chaos split, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

58/100

“Mrs. Vazquez seems like a but she is a terrible teacher.”

📝 Workload

32/100

“ ”

🅰️ Easy A Path

78/100

“Just stay on track and its an easy A.”

👍 Recommendation

55/100

“I Loved her! She was such a fun teacher and class.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • She is so funny, understands college students
  • She is rude for no reason.
  • Ms. Lynne is a wonderful nice teacher.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • A materials
  • The assignments and if you READ the instructions!!

Theme 3

🗓️ Organization Issues

  • Cancelled class often, which put us behind.
  • Takes forever to grade the assignments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

22 detailed reviews across online and in person with a .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

EAR349 reviews
EAR247 reviews
EAR263 reviews
EAR202 reviews
EAR191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values