AI Rate Professor

Electronics

Glen Graham

ELE11 · ELEC218C · ELE26 · ELE10 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Great pick if you want deep electronics skill and will engage; skip if you need a highly structured soft class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIndustry expertPassionate lecturesHelpful after classPractical projectsPolarizing personality
  • Strong knowledge and practical electronics teaching for motivated students
  • Most reviews praise help, passion, and real-world depth
  • A minority report disengaged AI-slide lectures or harsh personality

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students can pass with solid work and , but excellence and practical depth still require effort.

All evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Difficulty averages moderate-to-easy when you pay attention; advanced practical content can still feel tough.

All evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

, though a few say no and stress engagement over seat time.

All evidence is in person.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

; a couple of strongly negative personality reviews pull it down.

All evidence is in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Comments mention , and good grades for engaged students.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Homework and labs are manageable for many, but some courses have substantial work or equipment needs.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Expert, passionate, and helpful for most; recent outlier claims of AI slides and poor interaction hurt consistency.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and exams with practical skill focus.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

passionate expert teaching and style and personality.

Main concern

Inconsistent recent reports of AI-slide lectures and difficult personality for some students.

What students said

“He's an amazing teacher and engineer. Definitely one of those people you can learn from over a lifetime.”
ELE10
“Plays a powerpoint with an A. and .”
ELE10
“Awesome teacher. He's incredibly knowledgeable and helpful.”
ELE26
“Horrible prof/person... I didn't learn anything from him.”
ELE11

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard; some extra practical teaching is not always on the exam.

Practical labsExtra creditHomeworkExam content may exclude extra lecture material

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style; practical labs and .

LabsExtra creditClear grading criteria
“He will teach you many practical and additional info outside the syllabus, but it will not be part of the exam.”
ELE26
“ . Gives good grades =)”
ELE10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's an amazing teacher and engineer. Definitely one of those people you can learn from over a lifetime.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, balancing expert-teacher praise against two severe outliers. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Expert in electronics... Overall cool guy, great teacher, and very helpful.”

🔧 Practical Depth

80/100

“He will teach you many practical and additional info outside the syllabus”

⚠️ Polarizing Reviews

30/100

“Plays a powerpoint with an A. and .”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really passionate.
  • Made my first semester back to college exciting.
  • Lectures a little fast paced but there is a lot to cover after all.

Theme 2

🔧

  • but I think they have a low budget
  • I stayed many evenings well past the end of class to finish working on a .
  • the class may require you to purchase some equipment

Theme 3

⚠️ Negative Experiences

  • Won't answer questions, just tells you to read the slides again.
  • Horrible prof/person.
  • His lectures are stressful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 9 reviews with a long time span and two sharp negative outliers reduce consistency confidence.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ELE104 reviews
ELE112 reviews
ELE262 reviews
ELEC218C1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values