AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Patricia Worsham

ACC1B · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already know accounting well and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderAwful LecturesHeavy WorkloadUnhelpfulAccounting Bootcamp
  • Students describe that do not support the homework.
  • and and projects.
  • Workload and difficulty are high; only students who stay perfectly on track survive.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even a student who earned an A called her an , and difficulty ratings are maxed out.

Both online and ; sample is tiny.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Accounting content plus weak lectures and heavy chapter work make the course feel extremely hard.

All three reviews rate difficulty at 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

, so the pain is content and grading rather than seat time.

Evidence is limited but consistent across the few reviews that .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Two of three reviews are strongly negative and urge students not to enroll.

One older online review is more neutral-positive if you stay on track.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Discussion posts and projects are graded severely; students report .

Format shift

; in-person review focuses on refusal to help.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and tests pile up quickly if you fall behind.

Format shift

Online explicitly tags lots of homework and test-heavy load.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Lectures are called awful and unhelpful; students feel .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Mix of , and a .

Format shift

Older online review notes .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The , and advises against taking her for second-level accounting.

Main concern

Refusal to help struggling students and .

What students said

“She's rude and is unwilling to help. Her lectures are awful and don't help with the homework.”
ACC1B

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ACC1B combines simple homework and , and an on-campus final in older feedback.

Main concern

and tough project rubrics make even strong effort feel unfair.

What students said

“ and insanely tough grader, especially for her rubric on discussion posts.”
ACC1B
“There is homework and a quick for every chapter and the .”
ACC1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is traditional and test-heavy; one online review says the .

Chapter QuizzesOn-Campus FinalTest HeavyProjects

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review focuses on poor lectures and .

Homework DependentNo Extensions
“ if you are struggling to understand her awful lectures and doesn't help you.”
ACC1B

Online

and quizzes; one review states the . Reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Chapter QuizzesOn-Campus FinalProjects
“There is homework and a quick for every chapter and the .”
ACC1B
“Homework and and straightforward.”
ACC1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting harsh grading and weak lectures. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Is an awful teacher if you forgot accounting and are taking the .”

⚖️

18/100

“a 22/40 for a slight mistake on a citation was not fair at all.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“If you stay on track the work is manageable but if you get behind it is really hard to catch up and do well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are awful and don't help with the homework.
  • She's rude and is unwilling to help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Confusing and difficult projects.
  • TEST HEAVY

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with mixed eras and sparse detail limit confidence despite very consistent negative difficulty signals.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACC1B3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1