AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Sarah Burnett

EAR30 · EAR28 · EAR20 · EAR24 · EAR19 · EAR2O · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
84%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a caring mentor and will and lesson plans.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and supportiveGreat feedbackProject and lesson plansHilarious lecturesWants you to succeed
  • Students repeatedly call her kind, passionate, and one of the .
  • Courses center on projects, lesson plans, observations, and .
  • A few older complaints cite tough or , and rare communication issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Many earn As with solid project work, but she can be picky and some say you must work hard for the A.

Online often feels flexible and supportive; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

56/100

and reading rather than abstract theory.

Both formats describe manageable concepts; short-term sessions can feel heavier.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

while others say it is not, and participation still matters.

Online and flags.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Roughly five in and many call her the .

Strong praise is shared online and in person; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and and a few curve-change stories remain.

Format shift

Online feedback feels supportive; shifts.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect projects, lesson plans, observations, and .

Format shift

Online busywork is often easy but steady; and group work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students , and genuine care for student success.

Format shift

Excellence is consistent online and in person aside from rare communication complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and ongoing work more than pure exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize major projects; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews highlight hilarious engaging lectures, strong support, and and curve-change complaints.

Main concern

Older reviews say grading could tighten after the term or make an A hard without serious effort.

What students said

“I loved this professor so much, she was one of .”
EAR30
“Honestly shes one of the .”
EAR19
“After the class was over, she sent out an on grading everyone.”
EAR20

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students praise , and flexibility when life happens.

Main concern

A few report technical issues or unhelpful communication in older online sections.

What students said

“ and .”
EAR24
“She let me fix an assignment and met with me one-on-one and explained more in-depth and let me turn it in for a better grade.”
EAR19
“There were some technical difficulties with the online course and the .”
EAR20

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly projects and assignments; reviews rarely describe strict proctored exams.

Project heavyLesson plansObservationsGroup projectsExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and participation with little detailed exam policy.

Toy project and observationGroup projectsParticipation matters
“work on the and observation.”
EAR2O
“SUPEREASY CLASS, there but nothing to extreme”
EAR20

Online

Online comments focus on assignments, lesson-plan examples, and .

Assignment focusedLesson plan examplesGood feedback
“She provides plenty of examples to help you.”
EAR24
“She provides great feedback and .”
EAR24

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly shes one of the . and extensions and wants to genuinely see you succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews across online and and projects. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Honestly shes one of the . and extensions and wants to genuinely see you succeed.”

❤️ Caring Support

92/100

“She's so kind and really cares about the subject matter she's teaching.”

📝

88/100

“ and .”

⚖️

45/100

“After the class was over, she sent out an on grading everyone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is hilarious and amazing!!!!
  • she was one of .
  • She teaches wonderfully even during the pandemic.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • She's so kind and really cares about the subject matter she's teaching.
  • Very caring!
  • 1000/10 professor!!

Theme 3

📈 About Work and Grades

  • there but nothing to extreme
  • you have to be very specific on assignments in order to get a good grade.
  • If an A.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five detailed reviews across years and formats show a strong positive majority with a .

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EAR2010 reviews
EAR247 reviews
EAR192 reviews
EAR282 reviews
EAR2O2 reviews
Show 1 more courses
EAR302 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 5 · A 7

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1