AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Timothy Wallstorm

NUTRITION · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Avoid unless and never miss a single high-weight assignment.

Best fit · Self Taught ProGraded by few thingsNo real teachingLast-minute assignmentGPA damage risk
  • Single online nutrition review reports PowerPoint-only teaching with almost no instruction.
  • One late high-stakes assignment tanked a near-perfect grade to about 80%.
  • Student would not and no learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Course content seems easy, but and few graded items make an A fragile.

All evidence is from the single online review.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Student rated difficulty 1 and described .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The only and losing a high grade.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Missing one assignment dropped a 96% to 80% with almost no recovery path mentioned.

Format shift

Only online evidence is available.

Workload

Light

75/100

Very few graded items and no textbook, but the .

Format shift

Only online evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Student reports no real teaching and only PowerPoint slides.

Format shift

Only online evidence is available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Graded by few things, with .

Format shift

Only online evidence is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online nutrition student says there was no real teaching, only slides, and a .

Main concern

A single missed assignment can destroy the grade with little teaching support.

What students said

“No .”
nutrition
“I had a 96% the whole time & ended up with an 80% all over missing the 1 assignment for the class.”
nutrition

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Ruined my GPA & learned nothing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting sparse grading risk and weak teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“No .”

⚖️

25/100

“I had a 96% the whole time & ended up with an 80% all over missing the 1 assignment for the class.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“ . Ruined my GPA & learned nothing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • No .
  • learned nothing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I had a 96% the whole time & ended up with an 80% all over missing the 1 assignment for the class.
  • Posted last minute then dated to complete at 6pm & he graded it by 6:10.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2024 online review exists, so scores rest on a single detailed but unreplicated account.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

nutrition1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values