AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lycretia Ting

MATH · MAT11 · MAT35 · MATH35 · MAT52 · MATH63 · MAT65 · MATH11 · MATH110 · MATH52 · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
68.97%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you will attend , and can handle a stern classroom; otherwise pick another math instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough exteriorLots of homeworkTough graderExtra creditAttendance critical
  • survivors credit real learning and ; many others report humiliation and dropping.
  • Passing usually means never missing class, grinding homework, and .
  • Accent, fast pace, and limited study guides make the course feel harsh for weaker math students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

As appear for disciplined students with homework mastery, but , and .

; in-person As cluster among students who never miss class.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Fast pace, formula memorization, dense homework, and .

Both formats rate high difficulty; online adds communication barriers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Skip-class tags and repeated advice to attend every lecture dominate; quizzes and notes are tied to showing up.

; online sample is too small for a different policy claim.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Near 69% would-take-again and many success stories offset a large bloc of .

; in-person opinions split almost evenly by intensity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

, and method-specific scoring outweigh occasional rescues.

Format shift

Online offers little EC or support; in-person EC helps only if you stay enrolled and work.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Daily or heavy textbook and but consume large weekly time.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work; in-person also piles group work and board review.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

and reports of skipping steps, thick accent, and shaming questions.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are poor; and awful poles.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and quizzes decide the grade; replacing them.

Format shift

; online lacks detailed exam descriptions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

devoted students say she cares and ; many others say she humiliates question-askers and teaches too fast.

Main concern

Classroom climate and and Fs for students who need gentler help.

What students said

“She may appear mean but she is a real sweetheart. .”
MAT11
“she makes you feel dumb when you don't know the answer to things”
MAT35
“if you never miss class and do the B or A.”
MATH11

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and fail/drop outcomes.

Main concern

Poor communication and lack of support online with very high difficulty.

What students said

“It will be very hard to understand her. She barely communicates, and takes forever to grade.”
MATH
“Just awful and not truthful when asked a question. and does not offer or support.”
MAT52

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and graded strictly for her preferred methods even when answers are correct another way.

No study guidesTest heavyHomework-mirrored examsTough grading

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are hard, sometimes 8-12 questions without study if you mastered it her way.

No study guidesHard examsHomework-aligned if masteredMethod-specific grading
“No study guides and you have to memorize formulas.”
MAT35
“ , and you get no study guide for them”
MATH35
“The .”
MAT35

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe proctoring or and poor support.

Very hard courseSlow feedback
“ IF YOU DON'T WANNA FAIL”
MATH

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She comes off very mean but and cares if you show the effort and come to every class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (2 online, 48 in person), highlighting the , and . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarizing Teaching

50/100

“Possibly the .”

📚

26/100

“LOTS of .”

🎯 Effort Rewards

62/100

“ and ask questions you pass her class.”

🚨 Classroom Climate Risk

28/100

“she makes you feel dumb when you don't know the answer to things”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she really wants you to learn!
  • through.
  • She was a great teacher! If you do the work and pay attention you will have no problem.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you do the homework.
  • I got Cs on the , but ended with an A in the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she really cares and knows her stuff
  • Rude beyond belief.
  • she's really a and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years provide rich detail; opinions conflict but , and toughness are consistent.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 57
3 out of 56
2 out of 58
1 out of 521

Course coverage

MAT3523 reviews
MATH356 reviews
MAT524 reviews
MAT113 reviews
MATH113 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH633 reviews
352 reviews
MATH2 reviews
382441 review
MAT651 review
MATH1101 review
MATH521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

32 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 1 · A 14

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 2