AI Rate Professor

Economics

C Rajakone

ECO4 · ECON1 · ECONO4 · ECO8 · ECON4 · ECON7 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you will do the weekly writing and study the book; do not expect heavy hand-holding.

Best fit · Effort For RewardWeekly papersTests match quizzesKnowledgable but unevenAccent can be hardFair when you study
  • Many older reviews praise her as caring and easy if you study the book.
  • and one harsh no-help critique.
  • Expect exams, and fair grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

74/100

Students report B with , and exams pulled from quizzes or the book if you keep up.

Online review calls midterms and finals easy; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is standard intro econ with weekly papers and quizzes; most rate difficulty low to moderate.

Online ECON7 felt simple; and faster lecture pace.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

and one student passed with about 40 percent attendance.

The ; most in-person notes say no or not provided.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

About 60 percent would take again and many call her a favorite, but recent help and teaching complaints pull the score down.

Online reviewer highly recommends; in-person opinions range from 10/10 .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

case, and exams track quizzes and the textbook.

Format shift

; in-person mentions fairness and late-work flexibility.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

, and occasional projects keep the load steady but not light.

Format shift

Online cites subscription homework; and lots of .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Many praise knowledge, energy, and relatability, while others cite poor help, late arrival, or hard-to-follow delivery.

Format shift

Online experience was positive and caring; .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of weekly papers, quizzes, midterms/finals, and occasional longer projects.

Format shift

Online mentions midterms and finals; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Mostly in-person Econ; many call her sweet and fair, some struggle with accent, pace, or low teaching effort.

Main concern

Inconsistent help quality and ; a few say lectures miss the book-based tests.

What students said

“there's a but it is easy peasy and .”
ECO4
“ and your exams will be identical to quizzes.”
ECON4
“No actual teaching is done on her end.”
ECO-8

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

simple navigation, easy assignments and .

Main concern

Only one online review; external subscription cost.

What students said

“ . Online class is pretty simple to navigate. .”
ECON7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams usually mirror quizzes and textbook material rather than pure lecture notes.

Quiz-based examsTextbook-aligned testsMidterms and finals

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are often by the book and closely match quizzes; a .

Tests from quizzesBy-the-book examsFrequent quizzes
“ and your exams will be identical to quizzes.”
ECON4
“her tests are by the book defenitly get the book if .”
ECONO4

Online

Online student reported fairly easy midterms and finals with simple course navigation.

Easy midtermsEasy finals
“ .”
ECON7

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !! . its a little boring sometimes but she's a really sweet teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews spanning 2006-2024, balancing glowing older praise with mixed recent help concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Hilarious, exremely knowledgeable and very fair.”

👍 Recommendation Split

62/100

“I would 10/10 recommend this professor.”

📝 Weekly Writing Load

52/100

“ and I .”

⚠️ Help Gaps

40/100

“No actual teaching is done on her end.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is very kinds and knowledgable
  • Her lectures are interesting and she tries to keep them entertaining
  • she was so passionate in teaching economics and realted it to everyday things

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I attended class about 40% of the time and I got a B
  • Just do all your work and study for the tests and you will get a good grade

Theme 3

📚 About Work & Materials

  • there's a but it is easy peasy
  • There's a subscription to Knewton Alta and book purchase required

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews span many years with solid detail, but opinions conflict and grade data is sparse.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON47 reviews
ECON73 reviews
ECO42 reviews
ECO-81 review
ECON11 review
Show 1 more courses
ECONO41 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values