AI Rate Professor

Communication

Timothy Mount

COM3 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

; approach online sections with caution because organization is uneven.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringGives Good FeedbackGroup ProjectsSpeech OutlinesEngaging In Person
  • , and relatively easy with .
  • Online sections draw complaints about random deadlines, weak organization, and frustrating speech outlines.
  • Grades can be high, but online experience quality is inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students report high grades with relatively light challenge, especially when debates and a .

; online grades vary but still include A outcomes despite annoyance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content difficulty is generally low, though speech outlines and uneven online logistics add friction.

In-person feels easy and structured; online feels harder mainly due to disorganization rather than concept difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and optional in others, so flexibility depends on the offering.

In-person COM-3 lists mandatory attendance; as no.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Would-take-again sentiment is mostly positive, especially when students experience him live and engaged.

; online reviews are split and sometimes say pick someone else.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students call him an and attainable high marks.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in person; online complaints focus more on process than harsh scoring.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Group debates and a light final keep load manageable, but speech .

Format shift

Online workload pain centers on speech outlines and random deadlines more than total volume.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

In person he is inspiring and hands-on; online he is described as nice but disorganized and .

Format shift

Teaching quality is much stronger in person than online according to the available reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment mixes group debates, speech outlines, participation, and an easy in-class .

Format shift

In-person COM-3 highlights debates and a ; online focuses on speech outlines.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

support, and a light final.

Main concern

Sample is small, so the .

What students said

“ and understanding of student's needs and situations. 3 debates total in groups and a .”
COM-3
“He made class fun, & engaging. Professor is passionate & excited to teach you & it makes you excited to come to class.”
34655

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report random unlocks, unclear itineraries, and .

Main concern

Disorganized deadlines and .

What students said

“I feel as though he forgets about his online class most of the time. There is not a .”
34655
“3 speech outlines that are ANNOYING and time-consuming. Random deadlines on speeches”
34655
“The speech outlines are annoying and nice.”
34655

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The most concrete exam note is an easy in-class movie-analysis final; .

Easy FinalIn-Class Movie AnalysisGroup DebatesSpeech Outlines

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person COM-3 includes group debates and an as an in-class movie analysis.

Group DebatesEasy FinalIn-Class Movie Analysis
“3 debates total in groups and a .”
COM-3

Online

Online reviews emphasize speech outlines and shifting deadlines rather than a .

Speech OutlinesRandom Deadlines
“3 speech outlines that are ANNOYING and time-consuming.”
34655
“My third speech was unlocked on a random Sunday and locked again the following night”
34655

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and understanding of student's needs and situations. 3 debates total in groups and a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, comparing strong in-person support with uneven online logistics. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“It was a privilege to learn from Prof. Mount, He made class fun, & engaging.”

🖥️ Online Organization Issues

30/100

“There is not a . It's frustrating in the least.”

📝 Speech Outline Friction

45/100

“The speech outlines are annoying and nice.”

👍 Recommendation Tone

70/100

“Whenever the class was broken up into groups to do research he would take the time to sit with each group”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor is passionate & excited to teach you
  • Caring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A+

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Logistics

  • .
  • Random deadlines on speeches
  • not a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews with a sharp online versus in-person split limit confidence despite some detailed comments.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

346554 reviews
COM-31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1