AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Courtney Buchanan

ANT1H · ANT10 · ANTHRO2 · ANT2 · ANT1 · ANTRO1 · ANTH1 · ANT1O · ANT6 · ANT2H · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
85.29%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Strong pick for anthropology if you will keep up with readings and online work; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLenient with late workExtra credit friendlyReading and online homeworkPassionate anthropologyEmail hard to reach
  • Most students say do the readings and weekly online work and you can earn an A with and late-work leniency.
  • She is widely recommended for interesting lectures, care, and .
  • Workload is real but manageable; a minority .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many As with late , and clear do-the-work paths, though pure coasting still fails.

Both formats support easy-A-if-you-work; online adds more time cost.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Intro anthropology is approachable and interesting, but readings, modules, and .

In-person often feels easier; online/accelerated can feel heavier.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, yet some sections and online work allow passing without perfect presence.

In-person varies mandatory vs optional; online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

About 85% would take again and , and learnable content.

Strong across formats; sparse negatives focus on contact or self-teaching, not overall avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Late work for full credit, pools, multiple attempts, and easy-grader comments are common.

Format shift

Leniency appears in both formats; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and projects add steady work without usually becoming crushing.

Format shift

Online often feels heavier on reading time; .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

, and caring lectures dominate, with minority complaints about accessibility and .

Format shift

; online still praises help and interest.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and occasional group work.

Format shift

and exams; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes are mostly easy-to-moderate with , and high recommendation.

Main concern

and some reports that .

What students said

“ and . 10/10 !!!”
ANT1
“Accepts late work for full credit.”
ANT1
“Shes an amazing teacher and ive been recommending her to everyone!”
ANT2

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online and hybrid sections are interesting and supportive but and homework.

Main concern

and occasional hard-to-reach communication.

What students said

“this professor clearly WANTS her students to succeed + does a lot to help you get there.”
ANT2
“Her class was difficult and A LOT of work.”
ANT6
“ so you really need to budget at least 1-2 hours a day”
ANT1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and notes, sometimes timed, with leniency tools like corrections or .

Timed examsWeekly online quizzesTest correctionsCheat sheets sometimesUnessay or research paper

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report midterms/finals, timed quizzes, occasional cheat sheets, and project-style finals.

Timed examsWeekly online quizzesTest correctionsMidterms and final
“Exam and .”
ANT2
“even if you dont .”
ANT1
“Her class is basically 3 midterms and 1 final.”
ANT1

Online

and interesting material more than proctoring; exam tech details are sparse.

Lots of homeworkClear grading criteriaInteresting lectures
“A pretty easy A if you do all the work.”
ANT2
“Her class was difficult and A LOT of work. She is passionate about the subject and though!”
ANT6

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and . 10/10 !!! She makes ANT-1 a fun class”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 , and strong recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Professor Buchanan is excellent!!”

👍

88/100

“TAKE THE CLASS!”

📈 Easy If You Work

78/100

“as long as you do everything you should get an A.”

📬 Contact Friction

45/100

“she was hard to get a hold of.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very passionate about ANT-1.
  • Absolutely loved her class!
  • and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A pretty easy A if you do all the work.
  • Accepts late work for full credit.
  • She offers a lot of .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Access

  • Get ready to read
  • hard to get a hold of her other than that, it is very relaxing and interesting class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

34 reviews over many years with consistent themes on leniency, reading load, recommendation, and .

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 58
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANT112 reviews
ANT210 reviews
ANT64 reviews
ANT2H2 reviews
ANT101 review
Show 5 more courses
ANT1H1 review
ANT1O1 review
ANTH11 review
ANTHRO21 review
ANTRO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 3 · A 19 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values