AI Rate Professor

English

Richard Mansikka

ENG1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Avoid if and guidance; only consider if you already write well and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProWeak LecturesTough GraderPaper HeavyMixed Online FeedbackOff-Topic Discussions
  • but does not teach writing criteria well.
  • Paper load and .
  • One strong online review praises accessibility and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Grades of A and B appear, but and .

Online student earned A+; low B.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

and paper load; not content-impossible, but not light either.

Both formats sit around moderate English difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

as not mandatory.

Both online and as no.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Two of three experiences are negative on teaching value, with only one strong online endorse.

Online recommendation is high; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and a strict paper scoring.

Format shift

Strictness evidence is in-person; online .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

So many papers and if attendance is flexible.

Format shift

; online does not quantify workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students say he is nice but lectures poorly, digresses, and fails to prepare them for paper criteria.

Format shift

In-person teaching is poorly rated; one online .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Writing papers and reading drive the course more than tests.

Format shift

; online praises writing help.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Two in-person English reviews , and class talk often off topic or uncomfortable.

Main concern

Poor lecture value and .

What students said

“If you learn by lectures or need guidance from a professor you may want to look at another option.”
ENG1A
“hes a nice guy but i swear i didnt learn anything in the class.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One ENG1A online student strongly recommends him for accessibility and .

Main concern

Sample is only one glowing review, so online quality is unproven.

What students said

“Helps greatly with writing. ... and . 10/10 recommend.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment appears paper-centered with .

Paper Based AssessmentReading HeavyFeedback On Writing

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment is paper-driven with tough criteria students found hard to meet after weak lectures.

So Many PapersTough GraderReading Heavy
“when it was time to write the the criteria he gave us.”
ENG1A

Online

Online review focuses on writing help and .

Writing Feedback
“Helps greatly with writing. ... and .”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you learn by lectures or need guidance from a professor you may want to look at another option.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 sparse reviews with . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“This prof is really bad at teaching like no offense. hes a nice guy but i swear i didnt learn anything in the class.”

📝

80/100

“ and . 10/10 recommend.”

⚖️

30/100

“My A went to a low B.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • If you learn by lectures or need guidance from a professor you may want to look at another option.
  • he either talked about sexual things ... or super hero movies alot
  • Helps greatly with writing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • My A went to a low B.
  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews with conflicting formats and limited detail make any conclusion fragile.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values